summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/apt-pkg
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>2019-03-03 19:41:42 +0100
committerDavid Kalnischkies <david@kalnischkies.de>2019-03-03 21:52:40 +0100
commit3e3638dc9389591cfd30baa6c41d85c31127402a (patch)
tree45aeed4ec6433b8cc20641017c06fc3d940427f3 /apt-pkg
parentc3005277c395c7bcb81f470e3e0466e2fd3ab38e (diff)
downloadapt-3e3638dc9389591cfd30baa6c41d85c31127402a.tar.gz
Add explicit message for unsupported binary signature
Verifying the content of Release.gpg made us fail on binary signatures which were never officially supported (apt-secure manpage only documents only the generation of ASCII armored), but silently accepted by gpgv as we passed it on unchecked before. The binary format is complex and is itself split into old and new formats so adding support for this would not only add lots of code but also a good opportunity for bugs and dubious benefit. Reporting this issue explicitly should help repository creators figure out the problem faster than the default NODATA message hinting at captive portals. Given that the binary format has no file magic or any other clear and simple indication that this is a detached signature we guess based on the first two bits only – and by that only supporting the "old" binary format which seems to be the only one generated by gnupg in this case. References: e2965b0b6bdd68ffcad0e06d11755412a7e16e50 Closes: #921685
Diffstat (limited to 'apt-pkg')
-rw-r--r--apt-pkg/contrib/gpgv.cc18
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/apt-pkg/contrib/gpgv.cc b/apt-pkg/contrib/gpgv.cc
index 35d859849..d956eaf00 100644
--- a/apt-pkg/contrib/gpgv.cc
+++ b/apt-pkg/contrib/gpgv.cc
@@ -297,10 +297,24 @@ void ExecGPGV(std::string const &File, std::string const &FileGPG,
}
if (found_signatures == 0 && statusfd != -1)
{
- // This is not an attack attempt but a file even gpgv would complain about
- // likely the result of a paywall which is covered by the gpgv method
auto const errtag = "[GNUPG:] NODATA\n";
FileFd::Write(fd[1], errtag, strlen(errtag));
+ // guess if this is a binary signature, we never officially supported them,
+ // but silently accepted them via passing them unchecked to gpgv
+ if (found_badcontent)
+ {
+ rewind(detached.get());
+ auto ptag = fgetc(detached.get());
+ // §4.2 says that the first bit is always set and gpg seems to generate
+ // only old format which is indicated by the second bit not set
+ if (ptag != EOF && (ptag & 0x80) != 0 && (ptag & 0x40) == 0)
+ {
+ apt_error(std::cerr, statusfd, fd, "Detached signature file '%s' is in unsupported binary format", FileGPG.c_str());
+ local_exit(112);
+ }
+ }
+ // This is not an attack attempt but a file even gpgv would complain about
+ // likely the result of a paywall which is covered by the gpgv method
local_exit(113);
}
else if (found_badcontent)