From be5269d15f0e29b3683edc950767b099699e1df0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Burrows Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 15:28:24 -0700 Subject: Delete an obsolete comment that snuck into my earlier roll-up patch. --- tests/test_cmdline_download_progress_display.cc | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/test_cmdline_download_progress_display.cc b/tests/test_cmdline_download_progress_display.cc index 57b23de3..1f0d5310 100644 --- a/tests/test_cmdline_download_progress_display.cc +++ b/tests/test_cmdline_download_progress_display.cc @@ -260,17 +260,6 @@ TEST_P(CmdlineDownloadProgressDisplayTest, UpdateProgress2) EXPECT_TRUE(progress->update_progress(status2)); } -// The various file_started(), file_finished(), etc routines don't -// exhaustively verify that the status is displayed correctly; the -// assumption is that it gets displayed by the same routine that backs -// update_progress(). I test a few different status values to -// sanity-check this assumption, but that's all. -// -// (I could factor the actual display code into a separate routine -// behind another interface, exhaustively test it in its own unit -// test, and just verify here that the status is passed through when -// expected. Probably not worth the trouble) - TEST_P(CmdlineDownloadProgressDisplayTest, FileStartedWithIdNoNameWithFileSize) { { -- cgit v1.2.3