pkgsrc/security/gpg2dot, branch trunk [no description] https://git.osdyson.ru/mirror/pkgsrc/atom?h=trunk 2022-06-28T11:30:51Z *: recursive bump for perl 5.36 2022-06-28T11:30:51Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2022-06-28T11:30:51Z urn:sha1:5da87348cb57d8d1df6910cb892114c53beab8b0 *: recursive bump for perl 5.34 2021-05-24T19:49:01Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2021-05-24T19:49:01Z urn:sha1:baed0a2edb810dd7f45a65e897249f05eafbe0d3 *: bump PKGREVISION for perl-5.32. 2020-08-31T18:06:29Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2020-08-31T18:06:29Z urn:sha1:228898b81876514704aa12fa6ddfb7563b4cd5e5 Bump PKGREVISIONs for perl 5.30.0 2019-08-11T13:17:48Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2019-08-11T13:17:48Z urn:sha1:1e1e978e5bfccb88f11007db5a2f7c954c43a094 Recursive bump for perl5-5.28.0 2018-08-22T09:43:40Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2018-08-22T09:43:40Z urn:sha1:d88c56beea418327e469d8fec94d73758e3c00ae Bump PKGREVISION for perl-5.24.0 for everything mentioning perl. 2016-07-09T06:38:30Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2016-07-09T06:38:30Z urn:sha1:c52224af1507ede2a3174a81613831ec7c9d3667 Recursive PKGREVISION bump for all packages mentioning 'perl', 2015-06-12T10:50:58Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2015-06-12T10:50:58Z urn:sha1:65cd3b12e7a4d222e963e67065f870013fd3f64b having a PKGNAME of p5-*, or depending such a package, for perl-5.22.0. Reset maintainer, lukem has no pkgsrc capabilities. 2015-02-24T08:58:56Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2015-02-24T08:58:56Z urn:sha1:ea5dc3a1f633a56e40b69b9fa7b3b4120521bbbe Bump for perl-5.20.0. 2014-05-29T23:35:13Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2014-05-29T23:35:13Z urn:sha1:748acb2c4ac89a5af04946df5ba5f11140726d65 Do it for all packages that * mention perl, or * have a directory name starting with p5-*, or * depend on a package starting with p5- like last time, for 5.18, where this didn't lead to complaints. Let me know if you have any this time. Bump all packages for perl-5.18, that 2013-05-31T12:39:57Z wiz wiz@pkgsrc.org 2013-05-31T12:39:57Z urn:sha1:047a7f787e76857b9b0d4ad6fba74593dbd875e3 a) refer 'perl' in their Makefile, or b) have a directory name of p5-*, or c) have any dependency on any p5-* package Like last time, where this caused no complaints.