summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorriastradh <riastradh@pkgsrc.org>2013-05-11 20:24:01 +0000
committerriastradh <riastradh@pkgsrc.org>2013-05-11 20:24:01 +0000
commit1796d432a026ca3edff4f1862e20bd209d1d0119 (patch)
tree1b916be5fceecc429c783f58fbbd5b9fa8f3417d /doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile
parente16d39cc51e7ee3325dbe6dbf06d960dd0b87e0f (diff)
downloadpkgsrc-1796d432a026ca3edff4f1862e20bd209d1d0119.tar.gz
Add some more notes on cross-compilation for developers.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile')
-rw-r--r--doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile37
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile b/doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile
index c401759fbf0..0459ff62cc6 100644
--- a/doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile
+++ b/doc/HOWTO-dev-crosscompile
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Cross-compilation in pkgsrc (developer's guide) -*- outline -*-
Taylor R. Campbell <riastradh@NetBSD.org>
-$NetBSD: HOWTO-dev-crosscompile,v 1.2 2013/05/11 20:15:29 riastradh Exp $
+$NetBSD: HOWTO-dev-crosscompile,v 1.3 2013/05/11 20:24:01 riastradh Exp $
These are some notes on how to make your package cross-compilable.
There is no single recipe for it -- each package is different, and
@@ -53,14 +53,22 @@ TOOL_DEPENDS+= libxslt>=1.1.0:../../textproc/libxslt
* Native C and C++ compilers
Some software wants build tools written in C and C++ and then execute
-them natively at build-time. Sometimes configure scripts or makefiles
-accept a variable named CC_FOR_BUILD or similar to supply this; in
-that case, you can pass in the pkgsrc make variables NATIVE_CC and
-friends:
+them natively at build-time. Your package probably does this if when
+you try to cross-compile it, it fails with:
+ sh: Cannot execute ELF binary ./foobar
+
+Sometimes configure scripts or makefiles accept a variable named
+CC_FOR_BUILD or similar to build these tools. In that case, you can
+pass in the pkgsrc make variables NATIVE_CC and friends:
+
+.include "../../mk/bsd.prefs.mk"
+
+.if !empty(USE_CROSS_COMPILE:M[yY][eE][sS])
CONFIGURE_ENV+= CC_FOR_BUILD=${NATIVE_CC:Q}
CONFIGURE_ENV+= CXX_FOR_BUILD=${NATIVE_CXX:Q}
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LD_FOR_BUILD=${NATIVE_LD:Q}
+.endif
If the software doesn't use CC_FOR_BUILD, it may still be easy to find
the makefile rules that invoke $(CC) or $(LD) to build native tools
@@ -75,14 +83,25 @@ instance, you'll have to hack it yourself.
There's a lot of autoconf-configured software out there that uses
run-tests to learn about the environment, which doesn't work so well
-in cross-builds. Some of these can be patched to be replaced by
-compile-tests; otherwise, for a particular known target environment,
-you can pre-answer the tests for autoconf:
+in cross-builds. Your package probably uses this if it when you try to
+cross-compile it, it fails with:
+
+ configure: error: cannot run test programs while cross-compiling
+
+or
+
+ configure: error: cannot check for file existence when cross-compiling
+
+Some of these can be patched to be replaced by compile-tests.
+Otherwise, for a particular known target environment, you can
+pre-answer the tests for autoconf:
.include "../../bsd.prefs.mk"
-.if ${OPSYS} == "NetBSD"
+.if !empty(USE_CROSS_COMPILE:M[yY][eE][sS])
+. if ${OPSYS} == "NetBSD"
# Configure wants to check for /dev/random but can't. We know NetBSD
# always has a /dev/random, so inform autoconf of the fact.
CONFIGURE_ENV+= ac_cv_file__dev_random=yes
+. endif
.endif