summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/licenses/djb-nonlicense
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorschmonz <schmonz@pkgsrc.org>2006-05-05 21:23:35 +0000
committerschmonz <schmonz@pkgsrc.org>2006-05-05 21:23:35 +0000
commit6d2427cc418962d5ad583d334375c20e4446abc6 (patch)
tree2c2f00988e1faa52c13a7b21e2c2ac28bf3042ef /licenses/djb-nonlicense
parenta2f50fa7dff5c4a36b0ed730142ac763684aaaf2 (diff)
downloadpkgsrc-6d2427cc418962d5ad583d334375c20e4446abc6.tar.gz
Remove statement of questionable merit, pending outcome of internal
discussion. We don't need it yet and we may not need it at all. Also remove pseudo-helpful commentary. Users can interpret licenses (or lack thereof) just fine themselves. Thanks to gdt@ for being very careful about this stuff.
Diffstat (limited to 'licenses/djb-nonlicense')
-rw-r--r--licenses/djb-nonlicense11
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/licenses/djb-nonlicense b/licenses/djb-nonlicense
index 15fb34ea619..7088e978443 100644
--- a/licenses/djb-nonlicense
+++ b/licenses/djb-nonlicense
@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
-$NetBSD: djb-nonlicense,v 1.2 2006/05/02 16:28:05 schmonz Exp $
+$NetBSD: djb-nonlicense,v 1.3 2006/05/05 21:23:35 schmonz Exp $
Many software packages written by Dan Bernstein do not have licenses.
-As such, these packages cannot be considered OSI Certified Open
-Source Software. This may impact you if, for instance, your company's
-legal department mandates that only licensed software be used.
+Therefore, such software (trivially) does not have a license approved
+as Free or Open Source.
Bernstein's rationale for not placing his software under a license is
described at "Software user's rights":
@@ -14,7 +13,3 @@ Bernstein's redistribution conditions are described at "Frequently
asked questions from distributors":
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
-
-The pkgsrc team warrants that we have made a good-faith attempt to
-ensure that our packages of Bernstein's software behave correctly
-and meet his redistribution conditions.