Improve compatibility with systems which lack either round(), rint()

or nearbyint(), but might still have them declared in <math.h>.
Bump PKGREVISION.

1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/x11/gtk3/patches/patch-gtk_fallback-c89.c b/x11/gtk3/patches/patch-gtk_fallback-c89.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..042f51acc22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/x11/gtk3/patches/patch-gtk_fallback-c89.c
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+$NetBSD: patch-gtk_fallback-c89.c,v 1.1 2015/11/07 15:51:40 he Exp $
+
+Work around the fact that math.h may declare these functions
+non-static.
+
+--- gtk/fallback-c89.c.orig	2014-03-06 04:42:58.000000000 +0000
++++ gtk/fallback-c89.c
+@@ -22,19 +22,20 @@
+ /* Workaround for round() for non-GCC/non-C99 compilers */
+ #ifndef HAVE_ROUND
+ static inline double
+-round (double x)
++my_round (double x)
+ {
+   if (x >= 0)
+     return floor (x + 0.5);
+   else
+     return ceil (x - 0.5);
+ }
++#define round(x)	my_round(x)
+ #endif
+ 
+ /* Workaround for rint() for non-GCC/non-C99 compilers */
+ #ifndef HAVE_RINT
+ static inline double
+-rint (double x)
++my_rint (double x)
+ {
+   if (ceil (x + 0.5) == floor (x + 0.5))
+   {
+@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ rint (double x)
+       return ceil (x - 0.5);
+   }
+ }
++#define rint(x)		my_rint(x)
+ #endif
+ 
+ #ifndef HAVE_NEARBYINT
+@@ -60,8 +62,9 @@ rint (double x)
+ /* This is quite similar to rint() in most respects */
+ 
+ static inline double
+-nearbyint (double x)
++my_nearbyint (double x)
+ {
+   return floor (x + 0.5);
+ }
++#define nearbyint(x)	my_nearbyint(x)
+ #endif