Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This is a free software license according to the FSF:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#CeCILL-B
|
|
|
|
|
|
This follows a recent TNF board decision.
|
|
Reorganize non-approved licenses based on inclusion rationale. Align
comments to inclusion policy.
(This is a comment-only change.)
|
|
Long ago, I floated the notion of runtime controls based on licenses.
This seems not useful and is obviously not going to happen, so gc the
comment.
|
|
(This is a comment-only change.)
Add compliance with Debian Free Software Guidelines as evidenced by
inclusion in Debian main as a basis for inclusion in
DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES.
Clarify that the exclusion of AGPL by TNF board is higher priority
than the new DFSG section.
Add to the "obviously would be approved as Free" section the notion
that a license must also obviously not trigger the AGPL concern.
As proposed on tech-pkg, edited based on agc@ comments.
|
|
|
|
It is not mentioned by OSI/FSF/DSFG.
Discussion in progress on tech-pkg@
|
|
We can follow Fedora Project that treats it as Free and GPL compatible:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Henry_Spencer_Reg-Ex_Library_License
|
|
Up to now, there was a central list of variable name patterns that
defined whether a variable was printed as a sorted list, as a list or as
a single value.
Now each variable group decides on its own which of the variables are
printed in which way, using the usual glob patterns. This is more
flexible since different files sometimes differ in their naming
conventions.
Two variable groups are added: license (for everything related to
LICENSE) and go (for lang/go).
|
|
Sorry, I thought I had committed this earlier.
|
|
by leot.
|
|
|
|
happy is DFSG, not evaluated by OSI/FSF
No objections from <Greg Troxel>
|
|
Ninka can be installed from wip/ninka and analyzes each file individually,
thereby providing a much more detailed analysis than the ad-hoc method that
only looks at some COPYING files.
If Ninka is not installed, the naive fallback continues to be used.
|
|
Before, the first file that looked like a license file was considered.
The others were completely ignored. This led to a wrong license for
cross/arm-none-eabi-gcc. To prevent these cases in the future, the license
is only guessed if there is exactly one file with a typical license name.
This approach is still naive, but at least a little more precise. Replacing
the guess-license with a determine-licenses is much more complicated
though, since each source code file may have its own license declared, and
handling all these special cases leads to very complex license expressions
(like "gnu-gpl-v3 for all files, except for special.c, which is apache-2.0
or mit). This is very hard to do correctly.
|
|
|
|
It compares the license file from the package with the available licenses
in licenses/ and shows the diff to the best match.
This will hopefully make it easier for package authors to include the
LICENSE variable in the package Makefile. This variable being missing is
one of the most frequent error messages from pkglint (4187 out of 20044).
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
https://opensource.org/licenses/sisslpl
|
|
|
|
Discussed in tech-pkg@:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2016/04/20/msg016755.html
Thanks to Memnon Anon!
|
|
|
|
The vera-ttf-license is neither approved by OSI nor FSF but it is mostly in line
with Free Software principles. It is also accepted by the DFSG.
Discussed on tech-pkg@:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2015/09/10/msg015570.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
like the 1.3c version.
|
|
http://ctan.org/license/gfsl
Since this is basically the LaTeX Project Public License with one clause
removed, add it to the default acceptable licenses.
(lppl is fine with both OSI and FSF and already allowed.)
|
|
My bad, should have looked more clearly at the name of the list... DUH!
Thanks Thomas :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
now points to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
|
|
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#OpenSSL
|
|
OSI-approved, see
http://opensource.org/licenses/CECILL-2.1
|
|
|
|
since it's OSI-approved:
http://opensource.org/licenses/EUPL-1.1
ok@ gdt
|
|
commons).
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#SGIFreeB
|
|
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Arphic
|
|
Added ofl-v1.0 ofl-v1.1 and removed open-font-license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is Open and Free:
http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Sleepycat
http://opensource.org/licenses/sleepycat
|
|
|
|
approved as open source by OSI.
|
|
|