From c50939471fa7313a701cdfc4fa3d370aba0e7282 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tonio <tonio>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:50:23 +0000
Subject: Rename LATEX_ACCEPTED and LATEX_DEFAULT to TEX_ACCEPTED and
 TEX_DEFAULT It is more consistent with the tex.buildlink3.mk name. Also, if a
 package really needs latex, it just has to set TEX_ACCEPTED to latex
 distributions altough today, all TEX_ACCEPTED possibilities are latex
 distributions

---
 print/teTeX/Makefile | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'print/teTeX')

diff --git a/print/teTeX/Makefile b/print/teTeX/Makefile
index 48e187e02de..61895baa0d1 100644
--- a/print/teTeX/Makefile
+++ b/print/teTeX/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.39 2005/07/19 10:15:29 grant Exp $
+# $NetBSD: Makefile,v 1.40 2005/11/11 18:50:25 tonio Exp $
 #
 
 DISTNAME=	teTeX-2.0.2
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ MAINTAINER=	kei@NetBSD.org
 HOMEPAGE=	http://www.tug.org/tetex/
 COMMENT=	Thomas Esser's TeX distribution for UNIX compatible systems, version 2
 
-DEPENDS+=	teTeX-bin>=2.0.2:../../print/teTeX-bin
-DEPENDS+=	teTeX-sharesrc>=2.0.2:../../print/teTeX-sharesrc
 DEPENDS+=	texi2html>=1.52:../../textproc/texi2html
 
 CONFLICTS+=	teTeX2-[0-9]*
@@ -24,4 +22,5 @@ NO_BUILD=       yes
 
 do-install:	# do nothing
 
+.include "../../mk/tex.buildlink3.mk"
 .include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk"
-- 
cgit v1.2.3