package pkglint import "gopkg.in/check.v1" // In a single file, five variables get a default value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg?= value", "VAR.app?= value", "VAR.evl?= value", "VAR.shl?= value", "", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.", "WARN: file.mk:4: Variable VAR.evl is overwritten in line 10.") // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned are value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_assign(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app= value", "VAR.evl= value", "VAR.shl= value", "", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.", "WARN: file.mk:4: Variable VAR.evl is overwritten in line 10.") // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get appended a value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_append(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def+= value", "VAR.asg+= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl+= value", "VAR.shl+= value", "", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "WARN: file.mk:2: Variable VAR.asg is overwritten in line 8.", "WARN: file.mk:4: Variable VAR.evl is overwritten in line 10.") // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned a value using the := operator, // which in this simple case is equivalent to the = operator. The variables are // later overridden with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_eval(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def:= value", "VAR.asg:= value", "VAR.app:= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl:= value", "", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.", "WARN: file.mk:4: Variable VAR.evl is overwritten in line 10.") // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned a value using the != operator, // which runs a shell command. As of March 2019 pkglint doesn't try to evaluate // the shell commands, therefore the variable values are unknown. The variables // are later overridden using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_shell(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def!= value", "VAR.asg!= value", "VAR.app!= value", "VAR.evl!= value", "VAR.shl!= value", "", "VAR.def?= value", "VAR.asg= value", "VAR.app+= value", "VAR.evl:= value", "VAR.shl!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "WARN: file.mk:2: Variable VAR.asg is overwritten in line 8.", "WARN: file.mk:4: Variable VAR.evl is overwritten in line 10.") // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get a default value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_default_ref(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl?= ${OTHER}", "", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.") // TODO: "VAR.evl: is overwritten later", // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned are value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_assign_ref(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl= ${OTHER}", "", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.") // TODO: "VAR.evl: is overwritten later", // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get appended a value and are later overridden // with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_append_ref(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl+= ${OTHER}", "", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "WARN: file.mk:2: Variable VAR.asg is overwritten in line 8.") // TODO: "VAR.evl: is overwritten later", // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned a value using the := operator, // which in this simple case is equivalent to the = operator. The variables are // later overridden with the same value using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_eval_ref(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl:= ${OTHER}", "", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "NOTE: file.mk:8: Definition of VAR.asg is redundant because of line 2.") // TODO: "VAR.evl: is overwritten later", // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } // In a single file, five variables get assigned a value using the != operator, // which runs a shell command. As of March 2019 pkglint doesn't try to evaluate // the shell commands, therefore the variable values are unknown. The variables // are later overridden using the five different assignments operators. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__single_file_shell_ref(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("file.mk", "VAR.def!= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg!= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app!= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl!= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}", "", "VAR.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.evl:= ${OTHER}", "VAR.shl!= ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: file.mk:7: Default assignment of VAR.def has no effect because of line 1.", "WARN: file.mk:2: Variable VAR.asg is overwritten in line 8.") // TODO: "VAR.evl: is overwritten later", // TODO: "VAR.shl: is overwritten later" } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__after_including_same_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // including.mk:1: include "included.mk" // included.mk:1: VAR.x.y op1 ${OTHER} // including.mk:2: VAR.x.y op2 ${OTHER} // test := func(includedOp, includingOp string, diagnostics ...string) { opName := [...]string{"asg", "shl", "evl", "app", "def"} varname := sprintf("VAR.%s.%s", opName[NewMkOperator(includedOp)], opName[NewMkOperator(includingOp)]) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included.mk", sprintf("%s%s ${OTHER}", varname, includedOp)), sprintf("%s%s ${OTHER}", varname, includingOp)) NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) t.CheckOutput(diagnostics) } // As of March 2019, the != operator is ignored for the redundancy check. // TODO: Add the != operator. test("?=", "?=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.def.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.") test("?=", "=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Definition of VAR.def.asg is redundant because of included.mk:1.") // VAR.def.app defines a default value and then appends to it. This is a common pattern. // Appending the same value feels redundant but probably doesn't happen in practice. // If it does, there should be a note for it. test("?=", "+=") // VAR.def.evl introduces a subtle difference since := evaluates the variable immediately. // Therefore the assignment is not redundant. test("?=", ":=") test("=", "?=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.asg.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.") test("=", "=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Definition of VAR.asg.asg is redundant because of included.mk:1.") // VAR.asg.app defines a variable and later appends to it. This is a common pattern. // Appending the same value feels redundant but probably doesn't happen in practice. // If it does, there should be a note for it. test("=", "+=") // VAR.asg.evl evaluates the variable immediately and is thus not redundant. test("=", ":=") test("+=", "?=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.app.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.") // VAR.app.asg first appends and then overwrites. This might be a mistake. // TODO: Find out whether this case happens in actual pkgsrc and if it's accidental. // VAR.app.app first appends and then appends one more. This is a common pattern. test("+=", "=") test("+=", "+=") test("+=", ":=") test(":=", "?=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.evl.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.") test(":=", "=", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Definition of VAR.evl.asg is redundant because of included.mk:1.") test(":=", "+=") test(":=", ":=") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__after_including_different_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // Only test the ?=, = and += operators since the others are ignored, // as of March 2019. include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.asg?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.app?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.def= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.app= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.def+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.asg+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.app+= ${VALUE}"), "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.def.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.", "NOTE: including.mk:5: Default assignment of VAR.asg.def has no effect because of included.mk:4.", "NOTE: including.mk:8: Default assignment of VAR.app.def has no effect because of included.mk:7.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__before_including_same_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // Only test the ?=, = and += operators since the others are ignored, // as of March 2019. include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}", include("included.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}")) mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: including.mk:1: Default assignment of VAR.def.def has no effect because of included.mk:1.", "NOTE: including.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR.def.asg has no effect because of included.mk:2.", "NOTE: including.mk:4: Definition of VAR.asg.def is redundant because of included.mk:4.", "NOTE: including.mk:5: Definition of VAR.asg.asg is redundant because of included.mk:5.", "WARN: including.mk:8: Variable VAR.app.asg is overwritten in included.mk:8.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__before_including_different_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // Only test the ?=, = and += operators since the others are ignored, // as of March 2019. include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.asg?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.app?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.def= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.app= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.def+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.asg+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.app+= ${VALUE}", include("included.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}")) mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: including.mk:2: Variable VAR.def.asg is overwritten in included.mk:2.", "WARN: including.mk:5: Variable VAR.asg.asg is overwritten in included.mk:5.", "WARN: including.mk:8: Variable VAR.app.asg is overwritten in included.mk:8.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__independent_same_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // Only test the ?=, = and += operators since the others are ignored, // as of March 2019. include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included1.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}"), include("included2.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}")) mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // Since the two included files are independent, there cannot be any // redundancies between them. These redundancies can only be discovered // when one of them includes the other. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__independent_different_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // Only test the ?=, = and += operators since the others are ignored, // as of March 2019. include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included1.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.asg?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.def.app?= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.def= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${VALUE}", "VAR.asg.app= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.def+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.asg+= ${VALUE}", "VAR.app.app+= ${VALUE}"), include("included2.mk", "VAR.def.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.def.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.asg.app+= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.def?= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.asg= ${OTHER}", "VAR.app.app+= ${OTHER}")) mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // Since the two included files are independent, there cannot be any // redundancies between them. Redundancies can only be discovered // when one of them includes the other. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__file_hierarchy(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("other.mk", "VAR= other"), include("module.mk", "VAR= module", include("version.mk", "VAR= version"), include("env.mk", "VAR= env"))) NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) // No output since the included files are independent. t.CheckOutputEmpty() NewRedundantScope().Check(get("other.mk")) // No output since the file by itself in neither redundant nor // does it include any other file. t.CheckOutputEmpty() NewRedundantScope().Check(get("module.mk")) // No warning about env.mk because it is independent from version.mk. // Pkglint only produces warnings when it is very sure that the variable // definition is really redundant in all cases. // // One reason to not warn is that at the point where env.mk is evaluated, // version.mk had last written to the variable. Since version.mk is // independent from env.mk, there is nothing redundant here. // Pkglint doesn't do this, but it could. // // Another reason not to warn is that all locations where the variable has // ever been accessed are saved. And if the current location neither includes // all of the others nor is included by all of the others, there is at least // one access that is in an unrelated file. This is what pkglint does. t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: module.mk:1: Variable VAR is overwritten in version.mk:1.") } // The RedundantScope keeps track of the variable values. As a consequence, // it reports the variable assignment in the last line as being redundant, // instead of warning that it destroys the previous value. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__assign_and_append_followed_by_assign(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("redundant.mk", "VAR= first", "VAR+= second", "VAR= first second") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: redundant.mk:3: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") } // The redundancy analysis for a variable VAR is influenced by changes to // each variable that is referenced by VAR. The exact details also depend // on the assignment operators being used for VAR and OTHER. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__referenced_variable_is_modified(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) test := func(line1, line2, line3, line4 string, diagnostics ...string) { mklines := t.NewMkLines("filename.mk", line1, line2, line3, line4) NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutput(diagnostics) } test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER?= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: has no effect" "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites", "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER+= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER:= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites line 1" "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER!= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites line 1", "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") } // The redundancy analysis for a variable VAR is influenced by changes to // each variable that is referenced by VAR. The exact details also depend // on the assignment operators being used for VAR and OTHER. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__variable_referencing_another_is_modified(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) test := func(line1, line2, line3, line4 string, diagnostics ...string) { mklines := t.NewMkLines("filename.mk", line1, line2, line3, line4) NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutput(diagnostics) } // In this test, the second line is tested for each operator. test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR?= ${OTHER}", "OTHER= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites line 1" "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites", "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR+= ${OTHER}", "OTHER= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // TODO: "3: overwrites", // The value from line 2 is prefixed by a space, therefore pkglint // issues a warning here instead of an "is redundant" note. "WARN: filename.mk:2: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 4.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR:= ${OTHER}", "OTHER= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", // As of March 2019, pkglint only looks at each variable in isolation. // In this case, to detect that the assignment in line 1 has no effect, // it's necessary to trace the assignment in line 2 and then see that // the VAR from line 2 is immediately overwritten in line 4. "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") test( "OTHER= other-before", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "OTHER!= other-after", "VAR= ${OTHER}", "NOTE: filename.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__incomplete_then_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR=\tNetBSD", ".elif ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD", "VAR=\tFreeBSD", ".endif", "", "VAR?=\tdefault") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__complete_then_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR=\tNetBSD", ".else", "VAR=\tFreeBSD", ".endif", "", "VAR?=\tdefault") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: Pkglint could know that the ?= is redundant because VAR is // definitely assigned. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__conditional_then_override(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR=\tNetBSD", ".else", "VAR=\tFreeBSD", ".endif", "", "VAR=\tdefault") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: Pkglint could know that no matter which branch is taken, // the variable will be overwritten in the last line. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__set_then_conditional(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "VAR=\tdefault", "", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR=\tNetBSD", ".else", "VAR=\tFreeBSD", ".endif") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: Pkglint could know that no matter which branch is taken, // one of the branches will overwrite the assignment from line 1. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__branch_with_set_then_set(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR=\tfirst", "VAR=\tsecond", ".endif") mklines := get("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: Pkglint could know that the second assignment overwrites the // first assignment since they are in the same basic block. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } // FIXME: Continue the systematic redundancy tests. // // Tests where the variables are defined in a .for loop that might not be // evaluated at all. // // Tests where files are included conditionally and additionally have conditional // sections, arbitrarily nested. // // Tests that show how to suppress the notes about redundant assignments // and overwritten variables. The explanation must be helpful. // // Tests for dynamic variable assignments. For example BUILD_DIRS.NetBSD may // be modified by any assignment of the form BUILD_DIRS.${var} or even ${var}. // Without further analysis, pkglint cannot report redundancy warnings for any // package that uses such variable assignments. // // Tests for variables with modifiers, such as ${VAR:Uundef}, ${VAR:Mpattern}, // ${command:sh}, ${command::=value}. // // A test that compares a package with the default values from mk/defaults/mk.conf. // A package doesn't need to override these defaults, and the redundancy check // should notify the package author of this redundancy. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__override_after_including(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included.mk", "OVERRIDE= previous value", "REDUNDANT= redundant"), "OVERRIDE= overridden value", "REDUNDANT= redundant") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: including.mk:3: Definition of REDUNDANT is redundant because of included.mk:2.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__redundant_assign_after_including(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", include("included.mk", "REDUNDANT= redundant"), "REDUNDANT= redundant") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: including.mk:2: Definition of REDUNDANT is redundant because of included.mk:1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__override_in_Makefile_after_including(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("Makefile", include("module.mk", "VAR= value ${OTHER}", "VAR?= value ${OTHER}", "VAR= new value"), "VAR= the package may overwrite variables from other files") // XXX: The warnings from here are not in the same order as the other warnings. // XXX: There may be some warnings for the same file separated by warnings for other files. NewRedundantScope().Check(get("Makefile")) // No warning for VAR=... in Makefile since it makes sense to have common files // with default values for variables, overriding some of them in each package. t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: module.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR has no effect because of line 1.", "WARN: module.mk:2: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 3.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__default_value_definitely_unused(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR= value ${OTHER}", "VAR?= different value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // A default assignment after an unconditional assignment is redundant. // Even more so when the variable is not used between the two assignments. t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: module.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR has no effect because of line 1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__default_value_overridden(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR?= default value", "VAR= overridden value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: module.mk:1: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 2.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__overwrite_same_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR= value ${OTHER}", "VAR= value ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: module.mk:2: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__conditional_overwrite(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR= default", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR= opsys", ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__overwrite_inside_conditional(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR= generic", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR= ignored", "VAR= overwritten", ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: expected a warning "WARN: module.mk:4: line 3 is ignored" // Since line 3 and line 4 are in the same basic block, line 3 is definitely ignored. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__conditionally_include(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("module.mk", "VAR= generic", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", include("included.mk", "VAR= ignored", "VAR= overwritten"), ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("module.mk")) // TODO: expected a warning "WARN: module.mk:4: line 3 is ignored" // Since line 3 and line 4 are in the same basic block, line 3 is definitely ignored. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__conditional_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR= default", ".if ${OPSYS} == NetBSD", "VAR?= opsys", ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // TODO: WARN: module.mk:3: The value \"opsys\" will never be assigned // to VAR because it is defined unconditionally in line 1. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } // These warnings are precise and accurate since the value of VAR is not used between line 2 and 4. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__overwrite_same_variable_different_value(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "OTHER= value before", "VAR= value ${OTHER}", "OTHER= value after", "VAR= value ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // Strictly speaking, line 1 is redundant because OTHER is not evaluated // at load time and then immediately overwritten in line 3. If the operator // in line 2 were a := instead of a =, the situation would be clear. // Pkglint doesn't warn about the redundancy in line 1 because it prefers // to omit warnings instead of giving wrong advice. t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: module.mk:4: Definition of VAR is redundant because of line 2.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__overwrite_different_value_used_between(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "OTHER= value before", "VAR= value ${OTHER}", // VAR is used here at load time, therefore it must be defined at this point. // At this point, VAR uses the \"before\" value of OTHER. "RESULT1:= ${VAR}", "OTHER= value after", // VAR is used here again at load time, this time using the \"after\" value of OTHER. "RESULT2:= ${VAR}", // Still this definition is redundant. "VAR= value ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // There is nothing redundant here. Each write is followed by a // corresponding read, except for the last one. That is ok though // because in pkgsrc the last action of a package is to include // bsd.pkg.mk, which reads almost all variables. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__procedure_call_to_noop(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk", "CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread:= yes", include("pthread.builtin.mk", "# Nothing happens here."), "CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread:= no") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk")) t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk:1: Variable CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread is overwritten in line 3.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__procedure_call_implemented(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk", "CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread:= yes", include("pthread.builtin.mk", "CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread?= no", ".if !empty(CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread:M[Nn][Oo])", ".endif"), "CHECK_BUILTIN.pthread:= no") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk")) // This test is a bit unrealistic. It wrongly assumes that all files from // an .include directive are actually included by pkglint. // // See Package.readMakefile/handleIncludeLine/skip. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__procedure_call_implemented_package(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) t.SetUpPkgsrc() t.SetUpPackage("devel/gettext-lib") t.SetUpPackage("x11/Xaos", ".include \"../../devel/gettext-lib/buildlink3.mk\"") t.CreateFileLines("devel/gettext-lib/builtin.mk", MkRcsID, "", ".include \"../../mk/bsd.fast.prefs.mk\"", "", "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext?= no", ".if !empty(CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:M[nN][oO])", ".endif") t.CreateFileLines("devel/gettext-lib/buildlink3.mk", MkRcsID, "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:= yes", ".include \"builtin.mk\"", "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:= no") t.FinishSetUp() // Checking x11/Xaos instead of devel/gettext-lib avoids warnings // about the minimal buildlink3.mk file. G.Check(t.File("x11/Xaos")) // There is nothing redundant here. // Up to March 2019, pkglint didn't pass the correct pathnames to Package.included, // which triggered a wrong note here. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__procedure_call_infrastructure(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) t.SetUpPackage("x11/alacarte", ".include \"../../mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk\"") t.CreateFileLines("mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk", MkRcsID, "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:= yes", ".include \"pthread.builtin.mk\"", "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:= no") t.CreateFileLines("mk/pthread.builtin.mk", MkRcsID, "CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext?= no", ".if !empty(CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext:M[nN][oO])", ".endif") t.FinishSetUp() G.Check(t.File("x11/alacarte")) // There is nothing redundant here. // // 1. pthread.buildlink3.mk sets the variable // 2. pthread.builtin.mk assigns it a default value // (which is common practice) // 3. pthread.builtin.mk then reads it // (which marks the next write as non-redundant) // 4. pthread.buildlink3.mk sets the variable again // (this is considered neither overwriting nor redundant) // // Up to March 2019, pkglint complained: // // WARN: ~/mk/pthread.buildlink3.mk:2: // Variable CHECK_BUILTIN.gettext is overwritten in line 4. // // The cause for the warning is that when including files from the // infrastructure, pkglint only includes the outermost level of files. // If an infrastructure file includes another infrastructure file, // pkglint skips that, for performance reasons. // // This optimization effectively made the .include for pthread.builtin.mk // a no-op, therefore it was correct to issue a warning here. // // Since this warning is wrong, in March 2019 another special rule has // been added to Package.readMakefile.handleIncludeLine.skip saying that // including a buildlink3.mk file also includes the corresponding // builtin.mk file. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__shell_and_eval(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR:= value ${OTHER}", "VAR!= value ${OTHER}") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // As of November 2018, pkglint doesn't check redundancies that involve the := or != operators. // // What happens here is: // // Line 1 evaluates OTHER at load time. // Line 1 assigns its value to VAR. // Line 2 evaluates OTHER at load time. // Line 2 passes its value through the shell and assigns the result to VAR. // // Since VAR is defined in line 1, not used afterwards and overwritten in line 2, it is redundant. // Well, not quite, because evaluating ${OTHER} might have side-effects from :sh or ::= modifiers, // but these are so rare that they are frowned upon and are not considered by pkglint. // // Expected result: // WARN: module.mk:2: Previous definition of VAR in line 1 is unused. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__shell_and_eval_literal(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("module.mk", "VAR:= value", "VAR!= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // Even when := is used with a literal value (which is usually // only done for procedure calls), the shell evaluation can have // so many different side effects that pkglint cannot reliably // help in this situation. // // TODO: Why not? The evaluation in line 1 is trivial to analyze. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__included_OPSYS_variable(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) t.SetUpPackage("category/package", ".include \"../../category/dependency/buildlink3.mk\"", "CONFIGURE_ARGS+= one", "CONFIGURE_ARGS= two", "CONFIGURE_ARGS+= three") t.SetUpPackage("category/dependency") t.CreateFileDummyBuildlink3("category/dependency/buildlink3.mk") t.CreateFileLines("category/dependency/builtin.mk", MkRcsID, "CONFIGURE_ARGS.Darwin+= darwin") t.FinishSetUp() G.Check(t.File("category/package")) t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: ~/category/package/Makefile:21: Variable CONFIGURE_ARGS is overwritten in line 22.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__if_then_else(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("if-then-else.mk", ".if exists(${FILE})", "OS= NetBSD", ".else", "OS= OTHER", ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // These two definitions are of course not redundant since they happen in // different branches of the same .if statement. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__if_then_else_without_variable(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("if-then-else.mk", ".if exists(/nonexistent)", "IT= exists", ".else", "IT= doesn't exist", ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // These two definitions are of course not redundant since they happen in // different branches of the same .if statement. // Even though the .if condition does not refer to any variables, // this still means that the variable assignments are conditional. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__append_then_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("append-then-default.mk", "VAR+= value", "VAR?= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: append-then-default.mk:2: Default assignment of VAR has no effect because of line 1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__assign_then_default_in_same_file(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("assign-then-default.mk", "VAR= value", "VAR?= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: assign-then-default.mk:2: " + "Default assignment of VAR has no effect because of line 1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__eval_then_eval(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("filename.mk", "VAR:= value", "VAR:= value", "VAR:= other") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: filename.mk:1: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 2.", "WARN: filename.mk:2: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 3.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__shell_then_assign(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("filename.mk", "VAR!= echo echo", "VAR= echo echo") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // Although the two variable assignments look very similar, they do // something entirely different. The first executes the echo command, // and the second just assigns a string. Therefore the actual variable // values are different, and the second assignment is not redundant. // It assigns a different value. Nevertheless, the shell command is // redundant and can be removed since its result is never used. t.CheckOutputLines( "WARN: filename.mk:1: Variable VAR is overwritten in line 2.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__shell_then_read_then_assign(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.SetUpFileMkLines("filename.mk", "VAR!= echo echo", "OUTPUT:= ${VAR}", "VAR= echo echo") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // No warning since the value is used in-between. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__assign_then_default_in_included_file(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("assign-then-default.mk", "VAR= value", include("included.mk", "VAR?= value")) NewRedundantScope().Check(get("assign-then-default.mk")) // If assign-then-default.mk:1 were deleted, VAR would still have the same value. t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: assign-then-default.mk:1: Definition of VAR is redundant because of included.mk:1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__conditionally_included_file(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "VAR= value", ".if ${COND}", include("included.mk", "VAR?= value"), ".endif") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) // The assignment in including.mk:2 is only redundant if included.mk is actually included. // Therefore both included.mk:2 nor including.mk:2 are relevant. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__procedure_parameters(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) // TODO: make Tester.SetUpHierarchy accept a file multiple times. t.CreateFileLines("mk/pkg-build-options.mk", "USED:= ${pkgbase}") t.CreateFileLines("including.mk", "pkgbase= package1", ".include \"mk/pkg-build-options.mk\"", "", "pkgbase= package2", ".include \"mk/pkg-build-options.mk\"", "", "pkgbase= package3", ".include \"mk/pkg-build-options.mk\"") mklines := t.LoadMkInclude("including.mk") NewRedundantScope().Check(mklines) // This variable is not overwritten since it is used in-between // by the included file. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } // Branch coverage for info.vari.Constant(). The other tests typically // make a variable non-constant by adding conditional assignments between // .if/.endif. But there are other ways. The output of shell commands is // unpredictable for pkglint (as of March 2019), therefore it treats these // variables as non-constant. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope_handleVarassign__shell_followed_by_default(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "VAR!= echo 'hello, world'", include("included.mk", "VAR?= hello world")) NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) // If pkglint should ever learn to interpret simple shell commands, there // should be a warning for including.mk:2 that the shell command generates // the default value. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__overwrite_definition_from_included_file(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("including.mk", "SUBDIR= ${WRKSRC}", include("included.mk", "WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PKGBASE}"), "WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/overwritten") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("including.mk")) // Before pkglint 5.7.2 (2019-03-10), the above setup generated a warning: // // WARN: ~/included.mk:2: Variable WRKSRC is overwritten in including.mk:4. // // This warning is obviously wrong since the included file must never // receive a warning. Of course this default definition may be overridden // by the including file. // // The warning was generated because in including.mk:2 the variable WRKSRC // was used for the first time. Back then, each variable had only a single // include path. That include path marks where the variable is used and // defined. // // The variable definition at included.mk didn't modify this include path. // Therefore pkglint wrongly assumed that this variable was only ever // accessed in including.mk and issued a warning. // // To fix this, the RedundantScope now remembers every access to the // variable, and the redundancy warnings are only issued in cases where // either all variable accesses are in files including the current file, // or all variable accesses are in files included by the current file. t.CheckOutputEmpty() } func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope_handleVarassign__conditional(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) mklines := t.NewMkLines("filename.mk", "VAR= value", ".if 1", "VAR= conditional", ".endif") scope := NewRedundantScope() scope.Check(mklines) writeLocations := scope.get("VAR").vari.WriteLocations() t.Check( writeLocations, deepEquals, []MkLine{mklines.mklines[0], mklines.mklines[2]}) } // Ensures that commented variables do not influence the redundancy check. func (s *Suite) Test_RedundantScope__commented_variable_assignment(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) include, get := t.SetUpHierarchy() include("main.mk", include("redundant.mk", "VAR= value"), include("doc.mk", "#OTHER= ${VAR}"), "VAR= value", "OTHER= value") NewRedundantScope().Check(get("main.mk")) t.CheckOutputLines( "NOTE: main.mk:3: Definition of VAR is redundant because of redundant.mk:1.") } func (s *Suite) Test_includePath_includes(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) path := func(locations ...string) includePath { return includePath{locations} } var ( m = path("Makefile") mc = path("Makefile", "Makefile.common") mco = path("Makefile", "Makefile.common", "other.mk") mo = path("Makefile", "other.mk") ) t.Check(m.includes(m), equals, false) t.Check(m.includes(mc), equals, true) t.Check(m.includes(mco), equals, true) t.Check(mc.includes(mco), equals, true) t.Check(mc.includes(m), equals, false) t.Check(mc.includes(mo), equals, false) t.Check(mo.includes(mc), equals, false) } func (s *Suite) Test_includePath_equals(c *check.C) { t := s.Init(c) path := func(locations ...string) includePath { return includePath{locations} } var ( m = path("Makefile") mc = path("Makefile", "Makefile.common") mco = path("Makefile", "Makefile.common", "other.mk") mo = path("Makefile", "other.mk") ) t.Check(m.equals(m), equals, true) t.Check(m.equals(mc), equals, false) t.Check(m.equals(mco), equals, false) t.Check(mc.equals(mco), equals, false) t.Check(mc.equals(m), equals, false) t.Check(mc.equals(mo), equals, false) t.Check(mo.equals(mc), equals, false) }