1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
$NetBSD: patch-bn,v 1.1 2006/10/21 11:53:13 agc Exp $
--- ./sfsrwsd/filesrv.C.orig 2002-08-21 14:54:50.000000000 +0100
+++ ./sfsrwsd/filesrv.C
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ bool
filesrv::fixarg (svccb *sbp, reqstate *rqsp)
{
fh3trans fht (fh3trans::DECODE, fhkey);
- if (!nfs3_transarg (fht, sbp->template getarg<void> (), sbp->proc ())) {
+ if (!nfs3_transarg (fht, sbp->getarg<void> (), sbp->proc ())) {
nfs3exp_err (sbp, nfsstat3 (fht.err));
return false;
}
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ filesrv::fixarg (svccb *sbp, reqstate *r
* creating multiple mount points for each server. Is this bad? */
if (!sbp->getaui ()
&& !anon_checkperm (sbp, fsp->options,
- *sbp->template getarg<nfs_fh3> () == fsp->fh_root))
+ *sbp->getarg<nfs_fh3> () == fsp->fh_root))
return false;
#else
/* The other option is to disallow this. Then commands like "ls
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ filesrv::fixarg (svccb *sbp, reqstate *r
if (!sbp->getaui ()
&& !anon_checkperm (sbp, fsp->options,
(fsp == fstab.base ()
- && (*sbp->template getarg<nfs_fh3> ()
+ && (*sbp->getarg<nfs_fh3> ()
== fsp->fh_root))))
return false;
#endif
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ filesrv::fixarg (svccb *sbp, reqstate *r
switch (sbp->proc ()) {
case NFSPROC3_LOOKUP:
{
- diropargs3 *doa = sbp->template getarg<diropargs3> ();
+ diropargs3 *doa = sbp->getarg<diropargs3> ();
if (doa->name == ".." && doa->dir == fsp->fh_root) {
if (!getfsno (fsp)) {
nfs3exp_err (sbp, NFS3ERR_ACCES);
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ filesrv::fixarg (svccb *sbp, reqstate *r
case NFSPROC3_READDIR:
case NFSPROC3_READDIRPLUS:
{
- nfs_fh3 *rpa = sbp->template getarg<nfs_fh3> ();
+ nfs_fh3 *rpa = sbp->getarg<nfs_fh3> ();
if (*rpa == fsp->fh_root)
rqsp->rootfh = true;
break;
|
