Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Without this patch Ruby 1.9 is still complaining loudly about trying to
parse the spec files. The previous attempt to clean up this problem in
edc3ddf works for Ruby 1.8 but not 1.9.
I'd prefer to remove the shebang lines entirely, but doing so will cause
encoding errors in Ruby 1.9. This patch strives for a happy middle
ground of convincing Ruby it is actually working with Ruby while not
confusing it to think it should exec() to rspec.
This patch is the result of the following command run against the source
tree:
find spec -type f -print0 | \
xargs -0 perl -pl -i -e 's,^\#\!\s?/(.*)rspec,\#! /usr/bin/env ruby,'
|
|
Without this patch some spec files are using `ruby -S rspec` and others
are using `rspec`.
We should standardize on a single form of the interpreter used for spec
files.
`ruby -S rspec` is the best choice because it correctly informs editors
such as Vim with Syntastic that the file is a Ruby file rather than an
Rspec file.
|
|
We now use a shebang of: #!/usr/bin/env rspec
This enables the direct execution of spec tests again, which was lost earlier
during the transition to more directly using the rspec2 runtime environment.
|
|
rspec2 automatically sets a bunch of load-path stuff we were by hand, so we
can just stop. As a side-effect we can now avoid a whole pile of stupid things
to try and include the spec_helper.rb file...
...and then we can stop protecting spec_helper from evaluating twice, since we
now require it with a consistent name. Yay.
Reviewed-By: Pieter van de Bruggen <pieter@puppetlabs.com>
|
|
Doing a require to a relative path can cause files to be required more
than once when they're required from different relative paths. If you
expand the path fully, this won't happen. Ruby 1.9 also requires that
you use expand_path when doing these requires.
Paired-with: Jesse Wolfe
|
|
definitions (classes, definitions, and nodes).
Previously, type definitions were not represented directly in the AST.
Instead, the parser would instantiate types and insert them into
known_resource_types as soon as they were parsed. This made it
difficult to distinguish which types had come from the file that was
just parsed and which types had been loaded previously, which led to
bug 4496.
A side-effect of this change is that the user is no longer allowed to
define types inside of conditional constructs (such as if/else). This
was allowed before but had unexpected semantics (bugs 4521 and 4522).
It is still possible, however, to place an "include" statement inside
a conditional construct, and have that "include" statement trigger the
autoloading of a file that instantiates types.
|