diff options
| author | Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> | 2010-07-10 21:06:33 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> | 2010-07-10 21:06:33 -0700 |
| commit | b38248a433bf6849c7aed56b2841e150f16f837c (patch) | |
| tree | eb321a094600eb20022d150f3231d4aac631cb84 /tests | |
| parent | b45a59436010045a0b0257c8717f793caaa6b353 (diff) | |
| download | aptitude-b38248a433bf6849c7aed56b2841e150f16f837c.tar.gz | |
It's no longer necessary to explicitly mark newline() as unexpected, since we're using a strict mock now.
Not only is it unnecessary, it was generating confusing error messages if
newline() was expected but occurred out of order.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/test_transient_message.cc | 5 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_transient_message.cc b/tests/test_transient_message.cc index 98ddbc1a..1b58515c 100644 --- a/tests/test_transient_message.cc +++ b/tests/test_transient_message.cc @@ -89,11 +89,6 @@ namespace { EXPECT_CALL(*term_locale, wcwidth(two_column_char)) .WillRepeatedly(Return(2)); - - // The tests should never scroll past the first line (that's the - // whole point of the transient message object, after all). - EXPECT_CALL(*teletype, newline()) - .Times(0); } }; } |
