Fix signed vs unsigned printf format strings for block and inode numbers

There were still some %d's lurking when we print blocks & inodes; also
many of the counters in the e2fsck_struct were signed, and probably
need to be unsigned to avoid overflows.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/e2fsck/iscan.c b/e2fsck/iscan.c
index 6501e1f2..7e1bbd30 100644
--- a/e2fsck/iscan.c
+++ b/e2fsck/iscan.c
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
 	int		exit_value = FSCK_OK;
 	ext2_filsys	fs;
 	ext2_ino_t	ino;
-	int	num_inodes = 0;
+	__u32	num_inodes = 0;
 	struct ext2_inode inode;
 	ext2_inode_scan	scan;
 	
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
 	}
 	
 	print_resource_track(NULL, &global_rtrack);
-	printf(_("%d inodes scanned.\n"), num_inodes);
+	printf(_("%u inodes scanned.\n"), num_inodes);
 	
 	exit(0);
 }