diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'xmlschemas.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | xmlschemas.c | 558 |
1 files changed, 280 insertions, 278 deletions
diff --git a/xmlschemas.c b/xmlschemas.c index 121533f..0657b66 100644 --- a/xmlschemas.c +++ b/xmlschemas.c @@ -1471,7 +1471,7 @@ xmlSchemaWildcardPCToString(int pc) * @retValue: the returned value * @ws: the whitespace type of the value * - * Get a the cononical representation of the value. + * Get a the canonical representation of the value. * The caller has to free the returned retValue. * * Returns 0 if the value could be built and -1 in case of @@ -2039,6 +2039,7 @@ xmlSchemaErr4Line(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr ctxt, if (ctxt->type == XML_SCHEMA_CTXT_VALIDATOR) { xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt = (xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr) ctxt; const char *file = NULL; + int col = 0; if (errorLevel != XML_ERR_WARNING) { vctxt->nberrors++; vctxt->err = error; @@ -2067,6 +2068,7 @@ xmlSchemaErr4Line(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr ctxt, (vctxt->parserCtxt->input != NULL)) { file = vctxt->parserCtxt->input->filename; line = vctxt->parserCtxt->input->line; + col = vctxt->parserCtxt->input->col; } } else { /* @@ -2101,7 +2103,7 @@ xmlSchemaErr4Line(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr ctxt, node, XML_FROM_SCHEMASV, error, errorLevel, file, line, (const char *) str1, (const char *) str2, - (const char *) str3, 0, 0, msg, str1, str2, str3, str4); + (const char *) str3, 0, col, msg, str1, str2, str3, str4); } else if (ctxt->type == XML_SCHEMA_CTXT_PARSER) { xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt = (xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr) ctxt; @@ -6139,7 +6141,7 @@ xmlSchemaPGetBoolNodeValue(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, value = xmlNodeGetContent(node); /* * 3.2.2.1 Lexical representation - * An instance of a datatype that is defined as �boolean� + * An instance of a datatype that is defined as `boolean` * can have the following legal literals {true, false, 1, 0}. */ if (xmlStrEqual(BAD_CAST value, BAD_CAST "true")) @@ -6187,7 +6189,7 @@ xmlGetBooleanProp(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, return (def); /* * 3.2.2.1 Lexical representation - * An instance of a datatype that is defined as �boolean� + * An instance of a datatype that is defined as `boolean` * can have the following legal literals {true, false, 1, 0}. */ if (xmlStrEqual(val, BAD_CAST "true")) @@ -7717,8 +7719,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseAttributeGroupRef(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * SPEC src-redefine: * (7.1) "If it has an <attributeGroup> among its contents - * the �actual value� of whose ref [attribute] is the same - * as the �actual value� of its own name attribute plus + * the `actual value` of whose ref [attribute] is the same + * as the `actual value` of its own name attribute plus * target namespace, then it must have exactly one such group." */ if (pctxt->redefCounter != 0) { @@ -8867,7 +8869,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseUnion(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, type->flags |= XML_SCHEMAS_TYPE_VARIETY_UNION; /* * SPEC (Base type) (2) "If the <list> or <union> alternative is chosen, - * then the �simple ur-type definition�." + * then the `simple ur-type definition`." */ type->baseType = xmlSchemaGetBuiltInType(XML_SCHEMAS_ANYSIMPLETYPE); /* @@ -9035,7 +9037,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseList(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, type->flags |= XML_SCHEMAS_TYPE_VARIETY_LIST; /* * SPEC (Base type) (2) "If the <list> or <union> alternative is chosen, - * then the �simple ur-type definition�." + * then the `simple ur-type definition`." */ type->baseType = xmlSchemaGetBuiltInType(XML_SCHEMAS_ANYSIMPLETYPE); /* @@ -9180,9 +9182,9 @@ xmlSchemaParseSimpleType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, } /* * TargetNamespace: - * SPEC "The �actual value� of the targetNamespace [attribute] + * SPEC "The `actual value` of the targetNamespace [attribute] * of the <schema> ancestor element information item if present, - * otherwise �absent�. + * otherwise `absent`. */ if (topLevel == 0) { #ifdef ENABLE_NAMED_LOCALS @@ -9317,8 +9319,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseSimpleType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, /* * REDEFINE: SPEC src-redefine (5) * "Within the [children], each <simpleType> must have a - * <restriction> among its [children] ... the �actual value� of whose - * base [attribute] must be the same as the �actual value� of its own + * <restriction> among its [children] ... the `actual value` of whose + * base [attribute] must be the same as the `actual value` of its own * name attribute plus target namespace;" */ if (topLevel && ctxt->isRedefine && (! hasRestriction)) { @@ -10402,7 +10404,7 @@ xmlSchemaAddSchemaDoc(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * Given that the schemaLocation [attribute] is only a hint, it is open * to applications to ignore all but the first <import> for a given - * namespace, regardless of the �actual value� of schemaLocation, but + * namespace, regardless of the `actual value` of schemaLocation, but * such a strategy risks missing useful information when new * schemaLocations are offered. * @@ -10755,7 +10757,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseImport(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, XML_SCHEMAP_S4S_ATTR_INVALID_VALUE, NULL, node, xmlSchemaGetBuiltInType(XML_SCHEMAS_ANYURI), - NULL, namespaceName, NULL, NULL, NULL); + NULL, schemaLocation, NULL, NULL, NULL); return (pctxt->err); } /* @@ -10786,8 +10788,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseImport(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, thisTargetNamespace = WXS_BUCKET(pctxt)->origTargetNamespace; if (namespaceName != NULL) { /* - * 1.1 If the namespace [attribute] is present, then its �actual value� - * must not match the �actual value� of the enclosing <schema>'s + * 1.1 If the namespace [attribute] is present, then its `actual value` + * must not match the `actual value` of the enclosing <schema>'s * targetNamespace [attribute]. */ if (xmlStrEqual(thisTargetNamespace, namespaceName)) { @@ -10988,7 +10990,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseIncludeOrRedefine(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * for inclusions, since the that was the feedback from the * schema people. I.e. the following spec piece will *not* be * satisfied: - * SPEC src-include: "It is not an error for the �actual value� of the + * SPEC src-include: "It is not an error for the `actual value` of the * schemaLocation [attribute] to fail to resolve it all, in which * case no corresponding inclusion is performed. * So do we need a warning report here?" @@ -11005,7 +11007,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseIncludeOrRedefine(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * * SPEC src-redefine (1) * "If there are any element information items among the [children] - * other than <annotation> then the �actual value� of the + * other than <annotation> then the `actual value` of the * schemaLocation [attribute] must successfully resolve." * TODO: Ask the WG if a the location has always to resolve * here as well! @@ -11025,9 +11027,9 @@ xmlSchemaParseIncludeOrRedefine(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, if (bucket->origTargetNamespace != NULL) { /* * SPEC src-include (2.1) - * "SII has a targetNamespace [attribute], and its �actual - * value� is identical to the �actual value� of the targetNamespace - * [attribute] of SII� (which must have such an [attribute])." + * "SII has a targetNamespace [attribute], and its `actual + * value` is identical to the `actual value` of the targetNamespace + * [attribute] of SII' (which must have such an [attribute])." */ if (pctxt->targetNamespace == NULL) { xmlSchemaCustomErr(ACTXT_CAST pctxt, @@ -11375,8 +11377,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseModelGroup(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, /* * SPEC src-redefine: * (6.1) "If it has a <group> among its contents at - * some level the �actual value� of whose ref - * [attribute] is the same as the �actual value� of + * some level the `actual value` of whose ref + * [attribute] is the same as the `actual value` of * its own name attribute plus target namespace, then * all of the following must be true:" * (6.1.1) "It must have exactly one such group." @@ -11401,9 +11403,9 @@ xmlSchemaParseModelGroup(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, xmlChar *str = NULL; /* * SPEC src-redefine: - * (6.1.2) "The �actual value� of both that + * (6.1.2) "The `actual value` of both that * group's minOccurs and maxOccurs [attribute] - * must be 1 (or �absent�). + * must be 1 (or `absent`). */ xmlSchemaCustomErr(ACTXT_CAST ctxt, XML_SCHEMAP_SRC_REDEFINE, child, NULL, @@ -11517,8 +11519,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, * * SPEC (1.2) "...otherwise (<restriction> has no <simpleType> " * among its [children]), the simple type definition which is - * the {content type} of the type definition �resolved� to by - * the �actual value� of the base [attribute]" + * the {content type} of the type definition `resolved` to by + * the `actual value` of the base [attribute]" */ if (xmlSchemaPValAttrQName(ctxt, schema, NULL, node, "base", &(type->baseNs), &(type->base)) == 0) @@ -11541,8 +11543,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, /* * REDEFINE: SPEC src-redefine (5) * "Within the [children], each <simpleType> must have a - * <restriction> among its [children] ... the �actual value� of - * whose base [attribute] must be the same as the �actual value� + * <restriction> among its [children] ... the `actual value` of + * whose base [attribute] must be the same as the `actual value` * of its own name attribute plus target namespace;" */ xmlSchemaPCustomErrExt(ctxt, XML_SCHEMAP_SRC_REDEFINE, @@ -12303,7 +12305,7 @@ xmlSchemaParseComplexType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, xmlSchemaPtr schema, * SPEC * "...the third alternative (neither <simpleContent> nor * <complexContent>) is chosen. This case is understood as shorthand - * for complex content restricting the �ur-type definition�, and the + * for complex content restricting the `ur-type definition`, and the * details of the mappings should be modified as necessary. */ type->baseType = xmlSchemaGetBuiltInType(XML_SCHEMAS_ANYTYPE); @@ -13211,8 +13213,8 @@ xmlSchemaResolveElementReferences(xmlSchemaElementPtr elemDecl, if ((elemDecl->subtypes == NULL) && (elemDecl->namedType != NULL)) { xmlSchemaTypePtr type; - /* (type definition) ... otherwise the type definition �resolved� - * to by the �actual value� of the type [attribute] ... + /* (type definition) ... otherwise the type definition `resolved` + * to by the `actual value` of the type [attribute] ... */ type = xmlSchemaGetType(ctxt->schema, elemDecl->namedType, elemDecl->namedTypeNs); @@ -13250,7 +13252,7 @@ xmlSchemaResolveElementReferences(xmlSchemaElementPtr elemDecl, /* * The type definitions is set to: * SPEC "...the {type definition} of the element - * declaration �resolved� to by the �actual value� + * declaration `resolved` to by the `actual value` * of the substitutionGroup [attribute], if present" */ if (elemDecl->subtypes == NULL) @@ -13288,8 +13290,8 @@ xmlSchemaResolveUnionMemberTypes(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * SPEC (1) "If the <union> alternative is chosen, then [Definition:] - * define the explicit members as the type definitions �resolved� - * to by the items in the �actual value� of the memberTypes [attribute], + * define the explicit members as the type definitions `resolved` + * to by the items in the `actual value` of the memberTypes [attribute], * if any, followed by the type definitions corresponding to the * <simpleType>s among the [children] of <union>, if any." */ @@ -13584,7 +13586,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, return (0); } /* - * 3 If both O1 and O2 are sets of (namespace names or �absent�), + * 3 If both O1 and O2 are sets of (namespace names or `absent`), * then the union of those sets must be the value. */ if ((completeWild->nsSet != NULL) && (curWild->nsSet != NULL)) { @@ -13618,7 +13620,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* * 4 If the two are negations of different values (namespace names - * or �absent�), then a pair of not and �absent� must be the value. + * or `absent`), then a pair of not and `absent` must be the value. */ if ((completeWild->negNsSet != NULL) && (curWild->negNsSet != NULL) && @@ -13660,7 +13662,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, if (nsFound && absentFound) { /* * 5.1 If the set S includes both the negated namespace - * name and �absent�, then any must be the value. + * name and `absent`, then any must be the value. */ completeWild->any = 1; if (completeWild->nsSet != NULL) { @@ -13674,7 +13676,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } else if (nsFound && (!absentFound)) { /* * 5.2 If the set S includes the negated namespace name - * but not �absent�, then a pair of not and �absent� must + * but not `absent`, then a pair of not and `absent` must * be the value. */ if (completeWild->nsSet != NULL) { @@ -13689,7 +13691,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, completeWild->negNsSet->value = NULL; } else if ((!nsFound) && absentFound) { /* - * 5.3 If the set S includes �absent� but not the negated + * 5.3 If the set S includes `absent` but not the negated * namespace name, then the union is not expressible. */ xmlSchemaPErr(ctxt, completeWild->node, @@ -13700,7 +13702,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } else if ((!nsFound) && (!absentFound)) { /* * 5.4 If the set S does not include either the negated namespace - * name or �absent�, then whichever of O1 or O2 is a pair of not + * name or `absent`, then whichever of O1 or O2 is a pair of not * and a namespace name must be the value. */ if (completeWild->negNsSet == NULL) { @@ -13734,7 +13736,7 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, while (cur != NULL) { if (cur->value == NULL) { /* - * 6.1 If the set S includes �absent�, then any must be the + * 6.1 If the set S includes `absent`, then any must be the * value. */ completeWild->any = 1; @@ -13752,8 +13754,8 @@ xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } if (completeWild->negNsSet == NULL) { /* - * 6.2 If the set S does not include �absent�, then a pair of not - * and �absent� must be the value. + * 6.2 If the set S does not include `absent`, then a pair of not + * and `absent` must be the value. */ if (completeWild->nsSet != NULL) { xmlSchemaFreeWildcardNsSet(completeWild->nsSet); @@ -13836,9 +13838,9 @@ xmlSchemaIntersectWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* * 3 If either O1 or O2 is a pair of not and a value (a namespace - * name or �absent�) and the other is a set of (namespace names or - * �absent�), then that set, minus the negated value if it was in - * the set, minus �absent� if it was in the set, must be the value. + * name or `absent`) and the other is a set of (namespace names or + * `absent`), then that set, minus the negated value if it was in + * the set, minus `absent` if it was in the set, must be the value. */ if (((completeWild->negNsSet != NULL) && (curWild->nsSet != NULL)) || ((curWild->negNsSet != NULL) && (completeWild->nsSet != NULL))) { @@ -13887,7 +13889,7 @@ xmlSchemaIntersectWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, return(0); } /* - * 4 If both O1 and O2 are sets of (namespace names or �absent�), + * 4 If both O1 and O2 are sets of (namespace names or `absent`), * then the intersection of those sets must be the value. */ if ((completeWild->nsSet != NULL) && (curWild->nsSet != NULL)) { @@ -13937,7 +13939,7 @@ xmlSchemaIntersectWildcards(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* * 6 If the one is a negation of a namespace name and the other - * is a negation of �absent�, then the one which is the negation + * is a negation of `absent`, then the one which is the negation * of a namespace name must be the value. */ if ((completeWild->negNsSet != NULL) && (curWild->negNsSet != NULL) && @@ -13969,7 +13971,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSNSSubset(xmlSchemaWildcardPtr sub, if (super->any) return (0); /* - * 2.1 sub must be a pair of not and a namespace name or �absent�. + * 2.1 sub must be a pair of not and a namespace name or `absent`. * 2.2 super must be a pair of not and the same value. */ if ((sub->negNsSet != NULL) && @@ -13977,7 +13979,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSNSSubset(xmlSchemaWildcardPtr sub, (sub->negNsSet->value == super->negNsSet->value)) return (0); /* - * 3.1 sub must be a set whose members are either namespace names or �absent�. + * 3.1 sub must be a set whose members are either namespace names or `absent`. */ if (sub->nsSet != NULL) { /* @@ -14008,7 +14010,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSNSSubset(xmlSchemaWildcardPtr sub, xmlSchemaWildcardNsPtr cur; /* * 3.2.2 super must be a pair of not and a namespace name or - * �absent� and that value must not be in sub's set. + * `absent` and that value must not be in sub's set. */ cur = sub->nsSet; while (cur != NULL) { @@ -14170,7 +14172,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction2to4(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC (2.1.2) "R's {attribute declaration}'s * {type definition} must be validly derived from * B's {type definition} given the empty set as - * defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6)." + * defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6)." */ xmlSchemaPAttrUseErr4(pctxt, XML_SCHEMAP_DERIVATION_OK_RESTRICTION_2_1_2, @@ -14202,8 +14204,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction2to4(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * 2.1.3 ... one of the following must be true * - * 2.1.3.1 B's �effective value constraint� is - * �absent� or default. + * 2.1.3.1 B's `effective value constraint` is + * `absent` or default. */ if ((bEffValue != NULL) && (effFixed == 1)) { @@ -14212,7 +14214,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction2to4(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, xmlSchemaGetEffectiveValueConstraint(bcur, &effFixed, &rEffValue, NULL); /* - * 2.1.3.2 R's �effective value constraint� is + * 2.1.3.2 R's `effective value constraint` is * fixed with the same string as B's. * MAYBE TODO: Compare the computed values. * Hmm, it says "same string" so @@ -14246,9 +14248,9 @@ not_found: /* * (2.2) "otherwise the {base type definition} must have an * {attribute wildcard} and the {target namespace} of the - * R's {attribute declaration} must be �valid� with respect + * R's {attribute declaration} must be `valid` with respect * to that wildcard, as defined in Wildcard allows Namespace - * Name (�3.10.4)." + * Name ($3.10.4)." */ if ((baseWild == NULL) || (xmlSchemaCheckCVCWildcardNamespace(baseWild, @@ -14346,7 +14348,7 @@ not_found: * (4.2) "The complex type definition's {attribute wildcard}'s * {namespace constraint} must be a subset of the {base type * definition}'s {attribute wildcard}'s {namespace constraint}, - * as defined by Wildcard Subset (�3.10.6)." + * as defined by Wildcard Subset ($3.10.6)." */ xmlSchemaCustomErr4(ACTXT_CAST pctxt, XML_SCHEMAP_DERIVATION_OK_RESTRICTION_4_2, @@ -14360,8 +14362,8 @@ not_found: FREE_AND_NULL(str); return(pctxt->err); } - /* 4.3 Unless the {base type definition} is the �ur-type - * definition�, the complex type definition's {attribute + /* 4.3 Unless the {base type definition} is the `ur-type + * definition`, the complex type definition's {attribute * wildcard}'s {process contents} must be identical to or * stronger than the {base type definition}'s {attribute * wildcard}'s {process contents}, where strict is stronger @@ -14547,7 +14549,7 @@ inherit_next: {} if (WXS_IS_EXTENSION(type)) { if (baseType->attributeWildcard != NULL) { /* - * (3.2.2.1) "If the �base wildcard� is non-�absent�, then + * (3.2.2.1) "If the `base wildcard` is non-`absent`, then * the appropriate case among the following:" */ if (type->attributeWildcard != NULL) { @@ -14555,26 +14557,26 @@ inherit_next: {} * Union the complete wildcard with the base wildcard. * SPEC {attribute wildcard} * (3.2.2.1.2) "otherwise a wildcard whose {process contents} - * and {annotation} are those of the �complete wildcard�, + * and {annotation} are those of the `complete wildcard`, * and whose {namespace constraint} is the intensional union - * of the {namespace constraint} of the �complete wildcard� - * and of the �base wildcard�, as defined in Attribute - * Wildcard Union (�3.10.6)." + * of the {namespace constraint} of the `complete wildcard` + * and of the `base wildcard`, as defined in Attribute + * Wildcard Union ($3.10.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaUnionWildcards(pctxt, type->attributeWildcard, baseType->attributeWildcard) == -1) goto exit_failure; } else { /* - * (3.2.2.1.1) "If the �complete wildcard� is �absent�, - * then the �base wildcard�." + * (3.2.2.1.1) "If the `complete wildcard` is `absent`, + * then the `base wildcard`." */ type->attributeWildcard = baseType->attributeWildcard; } } else { /* - * (3.2.2.2) "otherwise (the �base wildcard� is �absent�) the - * �complete wildcard" + * (3.2.2.2) "otherwise (the `base wildcard` is `absent`) the + * `complete wildcard`" * NOOP */ } @@ -14582,7 +14584,7 @@ inherit_next: {} /* * SPEC {attribute wildcard} * (3.1) "If the <restriction> alternative is chosen, then the - * �complete wildcard�;" + * `complete wildcard`;" * NOOP */ } @@ -14831,12 +14833,12 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTDerivedOK(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, /* 2.2 */ if (type->baseType == baseType) { /* - * 2.2.1 D's �base type definition� is B. + * 2.2.1 D's `base type definition` is B. */ return (0); } /* - * 2.2.2 D's �base type definition� is not the �ur-type definition� + * 2.2.2 D's `base type definition` is not the `ur-type definition` * and is validly derived from B given the subset, as defined by this * constraint. */ @@ -14846,8 +14848,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTDerivedOK(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, return (0); } /* - * 2.2.3 D's {variety} is list or union and B is the �simple ur-type - * definition�. + * 2.2.3 D's {variety} is list or union and B is the `simple ur-type + * definition`. */ if (WXS_IS_ANY_SIMPLE_TYPE(baseType) && (WXS_IS_LIST(type) || WXS_IS_UNION(type))) { @@ -15159,14 +15161,14 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSTPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, * NOTE: This is somehow redundant, since we actually built a simple type * to have all the needed information; this acts as an self test. */ - /* Base type: If the datatype has been �derived� by �restriction� - * then the Simple Type Definition component from which it is �derived�, - * otherwise the Simple Type Definition for anySimpleType (�4.1.6). + /* Base type: If the datatype has been `derived` by `restriction` + * then the Simple Type Definition component from which it is `derived`, + * otherwise the Simple Type Definition for anySimpleType ($4.1.6). */ if (baseType == NULL) { /* * TODO: Think about: "modulo the impact of Missing - * Sub-components (�5.3)." + * Sub-components ($5.3)." */ xmlSchemaPCustomErr(ctxt, XML_SCHEMAP_ST_PROPS_CORRECT_1, @@ -15226,10 +15228,10 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSTPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* - * 2 All simple type definitions must be derived ultimately from the �simple - * ur-type definition (so� circular definitions are disallowed). That is, it - * must be possible to reach a built-in primitive datatype or the �simple - * ur-type definition� by repeatedly following the {base type definition}. + * 2 All simple type definitions must be derived ultimately from the `simple + * ur-type definition` (so circular definitions are disallowed). That is, it + * must be possible to reach a built-in primitive datatype or the `simple + * ur-type definition` by repeatedly following the {base type definition}. * * NOTE: this is done in xmlSchemaCheckTypeDefCircular(). */ @@ -15413,10 +15415,10 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTRestricts(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, } /* * MAYBE TODO: (Hmm, not really) Datatypes states: - * A �list� datatype can be �derived� from an �atomic� datatype - * whose �lexical space� allows space (such as string or anyURI)or - * a �union� datatype any of whose {member type definitions}'s - * �lexical space� allows space. + * A `list` datatype can be `derived` from an `atomic` datatype + * whose `lexical space` allows space (such as string or anyURI)or + * a `union` datatype any of whose {member type definitions}'s + * `lexical space` allows space. */ } else { /* @@ -15453,7 +15455,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTRestricts(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * 2.3.2.3 The {item type definition} must be validly derived * from the {base type definition}'s {item type definition} given - * the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6). + * the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6). */ { xmlSchemaTypePtr baseItemType; @@ -15500,7 +15502,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTRestricts(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, case XML_SCHEMA_FACET_WHITESPACE: /* * TODO: 2.5.1.2 List datatypes - * The value of �whiteSpace� is fixed to the value collapse. + * The value of `whiteSpace` is fixed to the value collapse. */ case XML_SCHEMA_FACET_PATTERN: case XML_SCHEMA_FACET_ENUMERATION: @@ -15553,8 +15555,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTRestricts(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, member = member->next; } /* - * 3.3.1 If the {base type definition} is the �simple ur-type - * definition� + * 3.3.1 If the {base type definition} is the `simple ur-type + * definition` */ if (type->baseType->builtInType == XML_SCHEMAS_ANYSIMPLETYPE) { /* @@ -15616,7 +15618,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTRestricts(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * 3.3.2.3 The {member type definitions}, in order, must be validly * derived from the corresponding type definitions in the {base * type definition}'s {member type definitions} given the empty set, - * as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6). + * as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6). */ { xmlSchemaTypeLinkPtr baseMember; @@ -15723,7 +15725,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCSimpleType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * src-simple-type.1 The corresponding simple type definition, if any, * must satisfy the conditions set out in Constraints on Simple Type - * Definition Schema Components (�3.14.6). + * Definition Schema Components ($3.14.6). */ if (WXS_IS_RESTRICTION(type)) { /* @@ -15821,8 +15823,8 @@ xmlSchemaParseCheckCOSValidDefault(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC (2.1) "its {content type} must be a simple type definition * or mixed." * SPEC (2.2.2) "If the {content type} is mixed, then the {content - * type}'s particle must be �emptiable� as defined by - * Particle Emptiable (�3.9.6)." + * type}'s particle must be `emptiable` as defined by + * Particle Emptiable ($3.9.6)." */ if ((! WXS_HAS_SIMPLE_CONTENT(type)) && ((! WXS_HAS_MIXED_CONTENT(type)) || (! WXS_EMPTIABLE(type)))) { @@ -15838,14 +15840,14 @@ xmlSchemaParseCheckCOSValidDefault(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, } /* * 1 If the type definition is a simple type definition, then the string - * must be �valid� with respect to that definition as defined by String - * Valid (�3.14.4). + * must be `valid` with respect to that definition as defined by String + * Valid ($3.14.4). * * AND * * 2.2.1 If the {content type} is a simple type definition, then the - * string must be �valid� with respect to that simple type definition - * as defined by String Valid (�3.14.4). + * string must be `valid` with respect to that simple type definition + * as defined by String Valid ($3.14.4). */ if (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(type)) ret = xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(ACTXT_CAST pctxt, node, @@ -15886,8 +15888,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCTPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * * SPEC (1) "The values of the properties of a complex type definition must * be as described in the property tableau in The Complex Type Definition - * Schema Component (�3.4.1), modulo the impact of Missing - * Sub-components (�5.3)." + * Schema Component ($3.4.1), modulo the impact of Missing + * Sub-components ($5.3)." */ if ((type->baseType != NULL) && (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(type->baseType)) && @@ -15904,9 +15906,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCTPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, return (XML_SCHEMAP_SRC_CT_1); } /* - * SPEC (3) "Circular definitions are disallowed, except for the �ur-type - * definition�. That is, it must be possible to reach the �ur-type - * definition by repeatedly following the {base type definition}." + * SPEC (3) "Circular definitions are disallowed, except for the `ur-type + * definition`. That is, it must be possible to reach the `ur-type + * definition` by repeatedly following the {base type definition}." * * NOTE (3) is done in xmlSchemaCheckTypeDefCircular(). */ @@ -16058,8 +16060,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSCTDerivedOK(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, if (type->baseType == baseType) return (0); /* - * SPEC (2.3.1) "D's {base type definition} must not be the �ur-type - * definition�." + * SPEC (2.3.1) "D's {base type definition} must not be the `ur-type + * definition`." */ if (WXS_IS_ANYTYPE(type->baseType)) return (1); @@ -16076,7 +16078,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSCTDerivedOK(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, /* * SPEC (2.3.2.2) "If D's {base type definition} is simple, then it * must be validly derived from B given the subset as defined in Type - * Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6). + * Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6). */ return (xmlSchemaCheckCOSSTDerivedOK(actxt, type->baseType, baseType, set)); @@ -16216,7 +16218,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSCTExtends(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, * definition must also have one, and the base type definition's * {attribute wildcard}'s {namespace constraint} must be a subset * of the complex type definition's {attribute wildcard}'s {namespace - * constraint}, as defined by Wildcard Subset (�3.10.6)." + * constraint}, as defined by Wildcard Subset ($3.10.6)." */ /* @@ -16313,9 +16315,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSCTExtends(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* * URGENT TODO SPEC (1.4.3.2.2.2) "The particle of the - * complex type definition must be a �valid extension� + * complex type definition must be a `valid extension` * of the {base type definition}'s particle, as defined - * in Particle Valid (Extension) (�3.9.6)." + * in Particle Valid (Extension) ($3.9.6)." * * NOTE that we won't check "Particle Valid (Extension)", * since it is ensured by the derivation process in @@ -16432,7 +16434,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, if (base->builtInType == XML_SCHEMAS_ANYTYPE) { /* * SPEC (5.1) "The {base type definition} must be the - * �ur-type definition�." + * `ur-type definition`." * PASS */ } else if ((type->contentType == XML_SCHEMA_CONTENT_SIMPLE) || @@ -16451,7 +16453,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, * SPEC (5.2.2.1) "The {content type} of the {base type * definition} must be a simple type definition from which * the {content type} is validly derived given the empty - * set as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6)." + * set as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6)." * * ATTENTION TODO: This seems not needed if the type implicitely * derived from the base type. @@ -16482,8 +16484,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, (xmlSchemaParticlePtr) base->subtypes))) { /* * SPEC (5.2.2.2) "The {base type definition} must be mixed - * and have a particle which is �emptiable� as defined in - * Particle Emptiable (�3.9.6)." + * and have a particle which is `emptiable` as defined in + * Particle Emptiable ($3.9.6)." * PASS */ } else { @@ -16512,7 +16514,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * SPEC (5.3.2.2) "The {content type} of the {base type * definition} must be elementOnly or mixed and have a particle - * which is �emptiable� as defined in Particle Emptiable (�3.9.6)." + * which is `emptiable` as defined in Particle Emptiable ($3.9.6)." * PASS */ } else { @@ -16545,9 +16547,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckDerivationOKRestriction(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, } /* * SPEC (5.4.2) "The particle of the complex type definition itself - * must be a �valid restriction� of the particle of the {content + * must be a `valid restriction` of the particle of the {content * type} of the {base type definition} as defined in Particle Valid - * (Restriction) (�3.9.6). + * (Restriction) ($3.9.6). * * URGENT TODO: (5.4.2) */ @@ -16616,7 +16618,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCCT(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, if (! WXS_HAS_SIMPLE_CONTENT(type)) { /* * 1 If the <complexContent> alternative is chosen, the type definition - * �resolved� to by the �actual value� of the base [attribute] + * `resolved` to by the `actual value` of the base [attribute] * must be a complex type definition; */ if (! WXS_IS_COMPLEX(base)) { @@ -16636,7 +16638,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCCT(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, * SPEC * 2 If the <simpleContent> alternative is chosen, all of the * following must be true: - * 2.1 The type definition �resolved� to by the �actual value� of the + * 2.1 The type definition `resolved` to by the `actual value` of the * base [attribute] must be one of the following: */ if (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(base)) { @@ -16742,14 +16744,14 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCCT(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * SPEC (3) "The corresponding complex type definition component must * satisfy the conditions set out in Constraints on Complex Type - * Definition Schema Components (�3.4.6);" + * Definition Schema Components ($3.4.6);" * NOTE (3) will be done in xmlSchemaTypeFixup(). */ /* * SPEC (4) If clause 2.2.1 or clause 2.2.2 in the correspondence specification * above for {attribute wildcard} is satisfied, the intensional * intersection must be expressible, as defined in Attribute Wildcard - * Intersection (�3.10.6). + * Intersection ($3.10.6). * NOTE (4) is done in xmlSchemaFixupTypeAttributeUses(). */ return (ret); @@ -16820,7 +16822,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseNameAndTypeOK(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, return (1); /* * SPEC (2) "R's occurrence range is a valid restriction of B's - * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK (�3.9.6)." + * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK ($3.9.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckParticleRangeOK(r->minOccurs, r->maxOccurs, b->minOccurs, b->maxOccurs) != 0) @@ -16912,19 +16914,19 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseNSCompat(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, { /* TODO:Error codes (rcase-NSCompat). */ /* - * SPEC "For an element declaration particle to be a �valid restriction� + * SPEC "For an element declaration particle to be a `valid restriction` * of a wildcard particle all of the following must be true:" * - * SPEC (1) "The element declaration's {target namespace} is �valid� + * SPEC (1) "The element declaration's {target namespace} is `valid` * with respect to the wildcard's {namespace constraint} as defined by - * Wildcard allows Namespace Name (�3.10.4)." + * Wildcard allows Namespace Name ($3.10.4)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckCVCWildcardNamespace((xmlSchemaWildcardPtr) b->children, ((xmlSchemaElementPtr) r->children)->targetNamespace) != 0) return (1); /* * SPEC (2) "R's occurrence range is a valid restriction of B's - * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK (�3.9.6)." + * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK ($3.9.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckParticleRangeOK(r->minOccurs, r->maxOccurs, b->minOccurs, b->maxOccurs) != 0) @@ -16984,21 +16986,21 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseNSSubset(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* TODO: Error codes (rcase-NSSubset). */ /* * SPEC (1) "R's occurrence range is a valid restriction of B's - * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK (�3.9.6)." + * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK ($3.9.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckParticleRangeOK(r->minOccurs, r->maxOccurs, b->minOccurs, b->maxOccurs)) return (1); /* * SPEC (2) "R's {namespace constraint} must be an intensional subset - * of B's {namespace constraint} as defined by Wildcard Subset (�3.10.6)." + * of B's {namespace constraint} as defined by Wildcard Subset ($3.10.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckCOSNSSubset((xmlSchemaWildcardPtr) r->children, (xmlSchemaWildcardPtr) b->children)) return (1); /* - * SPEC (3) "Unless B is the content model wildcard of the �ur-type - * definition�, R's {process contents} must be identical to or stronger + * SPEC (3) "Unless B is the content model wildcard of the `ur-type + * definition`, R's {process contents} must be identical to or stronger * than B's {process contents}, where strict is stronger than lax is * stronger than skip." */ @@ -17076,12 +17078,12 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseNSRecurseCheckCardinality(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, if ((r->children == NULL) || (r->children->children == NULL)) return (-1); /* - * SPEC "For a group particle to be a �valid restriction� of a + * SPEC "For a group particle to be a `valid restriction` of a * wildcard particle..." * - * SPEC (1) "Every member of the {particles} of the group is a �valid - * restriction� of the wildcard as defined by - * Particle Valid (Restriction) (�3.9.6)." + * SPEC (1) "Every member of the {particles} of the group is a `valid + * restriction` of the wildcard as defined by + * Particle Valid (Restriction) ($3.9.6)." */ part = (xmlSchemaParticlePtr) r->children->children; do { @@ -17092,7 +17094,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseNSRecurseCheckCardinality(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * SPEC (2) "The effective total range of the group [...] is a * valid restriction of B's occurrence range as defined by - * Occurrence Range OK (�3.9.6)." + * Occurrence Range OK ($3.9.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckParticleRangeOK( xmlSchemaGetParticleTotalRangeMin(r), @@ -17132,11 +17134,11 @@ xmlSchemaCheckRCaseRecurse(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, (r->children->type != b->children->type)) return (-1); /* - * SPEC "For an all or sequence group particle to be a �valid - * restriction� of another group particle with the same {compositor}..." + * SPEC "For an all or sequence group particle to be a `valid + * restriction` of another group particle with the same {compositor}..." * * SPEC (1) "R's occurrence range is a valid restriction of B's - * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK (�3.9.6)." + * occurrence range as defined by Occurrence Range OK ($3.9.6)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckParticleRangeOK(r->minOccurs, r->maxOccurs, b->minOccurs, b->maxOccurs)) @@ -17760,7 +17762,7 @@ xmlSchemaFinishMemberTypeDefinitionsProperty(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, xmlSchemaTypeLinkPtr link, lastLink, prevLink, subLink, newLink; /* * The actual value is then formed by replacing any union type - * definition in the �explicit members� with the members of their + * definition in the `explicit members` with the members of their * {member type definitions}, in order. * * TODO: There's a bug entry at @@ -17894,8 +17896,8 @@ xmlSchemaTypeFixupWhitespace(xmlSchemaTypePtr type) } } /* - * For all �atomic� datatypes other than string (and types �derived� - * by �restriction� from it) the value of whiteSpace is fixed to + * For all `atomic` datatypes other than string (and types `derived` + * by `restriction` from it) the value of whiteSpace is fixed to * collapse */ { @@ -18084,7 +18086,7 @@ xmlSchemaFixupSimpleTypeStageTwo(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC src-simple-type 1 * "The corresponding simple type definition, if any, must satisfy * the conditions set out in Constraints on Simple Type Definition - * Schema Components (�3.14.6)." + * Schema Components ($3.14.6)." */ /* * Schema Component Constraint: Simple Type Definition Properties Correct @@ -18344,7 +18346,7 @@ xmlSchemaFixupComplexType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, ( ((xmlSchemaTreeItemPtr) particle->children)->children == NULL))) { if (type->flags & XML_SCHEMAS_TYPE_MIXED) { /* - * SPEC (2.1.4) "If the �effective mixed� is true, then + * SPEC (2.1.4) "If the `effective mixed` is true, then * a particle whose properties are as follows:..." * * Empty sequence model group with @@ -18406,7 +18408,7 @@ xmlSchemaFixupComplexType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, if (type->contentType == XML_SCHEMA_CONTENT_EMPTY) { /* * SPEC (3.2.1) - * "If the �effective content� is empty, then the + * "If the `effective content` is empty, then the * {content type} of the [...] base ..." */ type->contentType = baseType->contentType; @@ -18513,7 +18515,7 @@ xmlSchemaFixupComplexType(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, particle->children = ((xmlSchemaParticlePtr) baseType->subtypes)->children; /* - * SPEC "followed by the �effective content�." + * SPEC "followed by the `effective content`." */ particle->next = effectiveContent; /* @@ -18657,12 +18659,12 @@ xmlSchemaCheckFacet(xmlSchemaFacetPtr facet, /* 4.3.5.5 Constraints on enumeration Schema Components * Schema Component Constraint: enumeration valid restriction - * It is an �error� if any member of {value} is not in the - * �value space� of {base type definition}. + * It is an `error` if any member of {value} is not in the + * `value space` of {base type definition}. * * minInclusive, maxInclusive, minExclusive, maxExclusive: - * The value �must� be in the - * �value space� of the �base type�. + * The value `must` be in the + * `value space` of the `base type`. */ /* * This function is intended to deliver a compiled value @@ -19097,9 +19099,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckAttrGroupCircular(xmlSchemaAttributeGroupPtr attrGr, * not be an <attributeGroup> with ref [attribute] which resolves * to the component corresponding to this <attributeGroup>. Indirect * circularity is also ruled out. That is, when QName resolution - * (Schema Document) (�3.15.3) is applied to a �QName� arising from + * (Schema Document) ($3.15.3) is applied to a `QName` arising from * any <attributeGroup>s with a ref [attribute] among the [children], - * it must not be the case that a �QName� is encountered at any depth + * it must not be the case that a `QName` is encountered at any depth * which resolves to the component corresponding to this <attributeGroup>. */ if (attrGr->attrUses == NULL) @@ -19356,8 +19358,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckAGPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC ag-props-correct * (1) "The values of the properties of an attribute group definition * must be as described in the property tableau in The Attribute - * Group Definition Schema Component (�3.6.1), modulo the impact of - * Missing Sub-components (�5.3);" + * Group Definition Schema Component ($3.6.1), modulo the impact of + * Missing Sub-components ($5.3);" */ if ((attrGr->attrUses != NULL) && @@ -19491,8 +19493,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckAttrPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC a-props-correct (1) * "The values of the properties of an attribute declaration must * be as described in the property tableau in The Attribute - * Declaration Schema Component (�3.2.1), modulo the impact of - * Missing Sub-components (�5.3)." + * Declaration Schema Component ($3.2.1), modulo the impact of + * Missing Sub-components ($5.3)." */ if (WXS_ATTR_TYPEDEF(attr) == NULL) @@ -19520,9 +19522,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckAttrPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * SPEC a-props-correct (2) * "if there is a {value constraint}, the canonical lexical - * representation of its value must be �valid� with respect - * to the {type definition} as defined in String Valid (�3.14.4)." - * TODO: Don't care about the *cononical* stuff here, this requirement + * representation of its value must be `valid` with respect + * to the {type definition} as defined in String Valid ($3.14.4)." + * TODO: Don't care about the *canonical* stuff here, this requirement * will be removed in WXS 1.1 anyway. */ ret = xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(ACTXT_CAST pctxt, @@ -19589,15 +19591,15 @@ xmlSchemaCheckElemPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * SPEC (1) "The values of the properties of an element declaration * must be as described in the property tableau in The Element - * Declaration Schema Component (�3.3.1), modulo the impact of Missing - * Sub-components (�5.3)." + * Declaration Schema Component ($3.3.1), modulo the impact of Missing + * Sub-components ($5.3)." */ if (WXS_SUBST_HEAD(elemDecl) != NULL) { xmlSchemaElementPtr head = WXS_SUBST_HEAD(elemDecl), circ; xmlSchemaCheckElementDeclComponent(head, pctxt); /* - * SPEC (3) "If there is a non-�absent� {substitution group + * SPEC (3) "If there is a non-`absent` {substitution group * affiliation}, then {scope} must be global." */ if ((elemDecl->flags & XML_SCHEMAS_ELEM_GLOBAL) == 0) { @@ -19641,9 +19643,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckElemPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * of the element declaration must be validly derived from the {type * definition} of the {substitution group affiliation}, given the value * of the {substitution group exclusions} of the {substitution group - * affiliation}, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Complex) (�3.4.6) + * affiliation}, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Complex) ($3.4.6) * (if the {type definition} is complex) or as defined in - * Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6) (if the {type definition} is + * Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6) (if the {type definition} is * simple)." * * NOTE: {substitution group exclusions} means the values of the @@ -19707,9 +19709,9 @@ xmlSchemaCheckElemPropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, /* * SPEC (2) "If there is a {value constraint}, the canonical lexical - * representation of its value must be �valid� with respect to the + * representation of its value must be `valid` with respect to the * {type definition} as defined in Element Default Valid (Immediate) - * (�3.3.6)." + * ($3.3.6)." */ if (typeDef == NULL) { xmlSchemaPErr(pctxt, elemDecl->node, @@ -19777,7 +19779,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckElemSubstGroup(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, /* * SPEC (2) "It is validly substitutable for HEAD subject to HEAD's * {disallowed substitutions} as the blocking constraint, as defined in - * Substitution Group OK (Transitive) (�3.3.6)." + * Substitution Group OK (Transitive) ($3.3.6)." */ for (head = WXS_SUBST_HEAD(elemDecl); head != NULL; head = WXS_SUBST_HEAD(head)) { @@ -19910,7 +19912,7 @@ xmlSchemaCheckElementDeclConsistent(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * SPEC Element Declarations Consistent: * "If the {particles} contains, either directly, * indirectly (that is, within the {particles} of a - * contained model group, recursively) or �implicitly� + * contained model group, recursively) or `implicitly` * two or more element declaration particles with * the same {name} and {target namespace}, then * all their type definitions must be the same @@ -20108,12 +20110,12 @@ xmlSchemaAreValuesEqual(xmlSchemaValPtr x, ptx = xmlSchemaGetPrimitiveType(tx); pty = xmlSchemaGetPrimitiveType(ty); /* - * (1) if a datatype T' is �derived� by �restriction� from an - * atomic datatype T then the �value space� of T' is a subset of - * the �value space� of T. */ + * (1) if a datatype T' is `derived` by `restriction` from an + * atomic datatype T then the `value space` of T' is a subset of + * the `value space` of T. */ /* - * (2) if datatypes T' and T'' are �derived� by �restriction� - * from a common atomic ancestor T then the �value space�s of T' + * (2) if datatypes T' and T'' are `derived` by `restriction` + * from a common atomic ancestor T then the `value space`s of T' * and T'' may overlap. */ if (ptx != pty) @@ -20214,8 +20216,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckAttrUsePropsCorrect(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr ctxt, * SPEC au-props-correct (1) * "The values of the properties of an attribute use must be as * described in the property tableau in The Attribute Use Schema - * Component (�3.5.1), modulo the impact of Missing - * Sub-components (�5.3)." + * Component ($3.5.1), modulo the impact of Missing + * Sub-components ($5.3)." */ if (((WXS_ATTRUSE_DECL(use))->defValue != NULL) && @@ -20316,8 +20318,8 @@ xmlSchemaResolveAttrTypeReferences(xmlSchemaAttributePtr item, /* * The simple type definition corresponding to the <simpleType> element * information item in the [children], if present, otherwise the simple - * type definition �resolved� to by the �actual value� of the type - * [attribute], if present, otherwise the �simple ur-type definition�. + * type definition `resolved` to by the `actual value` of the type + * [attribute], if present, otherwise the `simple ur-type definition`. */ if (item->flags & XML_SCHEMAS_ATTR_INTERNAL_RESOLVED) return(0); @@ -20481,11 +20483,11 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCRedefineFirst(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt) /* * SPEC src-redefine: - * (6.2.1) "The �actual value� of its own name attribute plus - * target namespace must successfully �resolve� to a model + * (6.2.1) "The `actual value` of its own name attribute plus + * target namespace must successfully `resolve` to a model * group definition in I." - * (7.2.1) "The �actual value� of its own name attribute plus - * target namespace must successfully �resolve� to an attribute + * (7.2.1) "The `actual value` of its own name attribute plus + * target namespace must successfully `resolve` to an attribute * group definition in I." * @@ -20658,10 +20660,10 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCRedefineSecond(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt) * SPEC src-redefine: * (6.2.2) "The {model group} of the model group definition * which corresponds to it per XML Representation of Model - * Group Definition Schema Components (�3.7.2) must be a - * �valid restriction� of the {model group} of that model + * Group Definition Schema Components ($3.7.2) must be a + * `valid restriction` of the {model group} of that model * group definition in I, as defined in Particle Valid - * (Restriction) (�3.9.6)." + * (Restriction) ($3.9.6)." */ break; case XML_SCHEMA_TYPE_ATTRIBUTEGROUP: @@ -20670,11 +20672,11 @@ xmlSchemaCheckSRCRedefineSecond(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt) * (7.2.2) "The {attribute uses} and {attribute wildcard} of * the attribute group definition which corresponds to it * per XML Representation of Attribute Group Definition Schema - * Components (�3.6.2) must be �valid restrictions� of the + * Components ($3.6.2) must be `valid restrictions` of the * {attribute uses} and {attribute wildcard} of that attribute * group definition in I, as defined in clause 2, clause 3 and * clause 4 of Derivation Valid (Restriction, Complex) - * (�3.4.6) (where references to the base type definition are + * ($3.4.6) (where references to the base type definition are * understood as references to the attribute group definition * in I)." */ @@ -20849,9 +20851,9 @@ xmlSchemaFixupComponents(xmlSchemaParserCtxtPtr pctxt, * (6.2.2) The {model group} of the model group definition which * corresponds to it per XML Representation of Model Group - * Definition Schema Components (�3.7.2) must be a �valid - * restriction� of the {model group} of that model group definition - * in I, as defined in Particle Valid (Restriction) (�3.9.6)." + * Definition Schema Components ($3.7.2) must be a `valid + * restriction` of the {model group} of that model group definition + * in I, as defined in Particle Valid (Restriction) ($3.9.6)." */ xmlSchemaCheckSRCRedefineFirst(pctxt); @@ -21535,8 +21537,8 @@ xmlSchemaGetWhiteSpaceFacetValue(xmlSchemaTypePtr type) return(XML_SCHEMA_WHITESPACE_REPLACE); else { /* - * For all �atomic� datatypes other than string (and types �derived� - * by �restriction� from it) the value of whiteSpace is fixed to + * For all `atomic` datatypes other than string (and types `derived` + * by `restriction` from it) the value of whiteSpace is fixed to * collapse * Note that this includes built-in list datatypes. */ @@ -22841,7 +22843,7 @@ xmlSchemaXPathProcessHistory(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt, xmlChar *str = NULL; /* * cvc-identity-constraint: - * 3 For each node in the �target node set� all + * 3 For each node in the `target node set` all * of the {fields}, with that node as the context * node, evaluate to either an empty node-set or * a node-set with exactly one member, which must @@ -22971,8 +22973,8 @@ create_key: /* * 4.1 If the {identity-constraint category} is unique(/key), - * then no two members of the �qualified node set� have - * �key-sequences� whose members are pairwise equal, as + * then no two members of the `qualified node set` have + * `key-sequences` whose members are pairwise equal, as * defined by Equal in [XML Schemas: Datatypes]. * * Get the IDC binding from the matcher and check for @@ -23100,10 +23102,10 @@ selector_key_error: { xmlChar *str = NULL; /* - * 4.2.1 (KEY) The �target node set� and the - * �qualified node set� are equal, that is, every - * member of the �target node set� is also a member - * of the �qualified node set� and vice versa. + * 4.2.1 (KEY) The `target node set` and the + * `qualified node set` are equal, that is, every + * member of the `target node set` is also a member + * of the `qualified node set` and vice versa. */ xmlSchemaCustomErr(ACTXT_CAST vctxt, XML_SCHEMAV_CVC_IDC, NULL, @@ -24499,14 +24501,14 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, */ /* * 2.1 If The definition is ENTITY or is validly derived from ENTITY given - * the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6), then - * the string must be a �declared entity name�. + * the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6), then + * the string must be a `declared entity name`. */ /* * 2.2 If The definition is ENTITIES or is validly derived from ENTITIES - * given the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6), - * then every whitespace-delimited substring of the string must be a �declared - * entity name�. + * given the empty set, as defined in Type Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6), + * then every whitespace-delimited substring of the string must be a `declared + * entity name`. */ /* * 2.3 otherwise no further condition applies. @@ -24518,8 +24520,8 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, if (WXS_IS_ANY_SIMPLE_TYPE(type) || WXS_IS_ATOMIC(type)) { xmlSchemaTypePtr biType; /* The built-in type. */ /* - * SPEC (1.2.1) "if {variety} is �atomic� then the string must �match� - * a literal in the �lexical space� of {base type definition}" + * SPEC (1.2.1) "if {variety} is `atomic` then the string must `match` + * a literal in the `lexical space` of {base type definition}" */ /* * Whitespace-normalize. @@ -24630,9 +24632,9 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, xmlChar *tmpValue = NULL; unsigned long len = 0; xmlSchemaValPtr prevVal = NULL, curVal = NULL; - /* 1.2.2 if {variety} is �list� then the string must be a sequence - * of white space separated tokens, each of which �match�es a literal - * in the �lexical space� of {item type definition} + /* 1.2.2 if {variety} is `list` then the string must be a sequence + * of white space separated tokens, each of which `match`es a literal + * in the `lexical space` of {item type definition} */ /* * Note that XML_SCHEMAS_TYPE_NORMVALUENEEDED will be set if @@ -24713,10 +24715,10 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, } else if (WXS_IS_UNION(type)) { xmlSchemaTypeLinkPtr memberLink; /* - * TODO: For all datatypes �derived� by �union� whiteSpace does - * not apply directly; however, the normalization behavior of �union� + * TODO: For all datatypes `derived` by `union` whiteSpace does + * not apply directly; however, the normalization behavior of `union` * types is controlled by the value of whiteSpace on that one of the - * �memberTypes� against which the �union� is successfully validated. + * `memberTypes` against which the `union` is successfully validated. * * This means that the value is normalized by the first validating * member type, then the facets of the union type are applied. This @@ -24724,8 +24726,8 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, */ /* - * 1.2.3 if {variety} is �union� then the string must �match� a - * literal in the �lexical space� of at least one member of + * 1.2.3 if {variety} is `union` then the string must `match` a + * literal in the `lexical space` of at least one member of * {member type definitions} */ memberLink = xmlSchemaGetUnionSimpleTypeMemberTypes(type); @@ -24764,9 +24766,9 @@ xmlSchemaVCheckCVCSimpleType(xmlSchemaAbstractCtxtPtr actxt, */ if ((ret == 0) && (type->flags & XML_SCHEMAS_TYPE_HAS_FACETS)) { /* - * The normalization behavior of �union� types is controlled by - * the value of whiteSpace on that one of the �memberTypes� - * against which the �union� is successfully validated. + * The normalization behavior of `union` types is controlled by + * the value of whiteSpace on that one of the `memberTypes` + * against which the `union` is successfully validated. */ NORMALIZE(memberLink->type); ret = xmlSchemaValidateFacets(actxt, node, type, @@ -24926,14 +24928,14 @@ xmlSchemaProcessXSIType(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt, /* * SPEC cvc-elt (3.3.4) : (4.3) (Type Derivation OK) - * "The �local type definition� must be validly + * "The `local type definition` must be validly * derived from the {type definition} given the union of * the {disallowed substitutions} and the {type definition}'s * {prohibited substitutions}, as defined in - * Type Derivation OK (Complex) (�3.4.6) + * Type Derivation OK (Complex) ($3.4.6) * (if it is a complex type definition), * or given {disallowed substitutions} as defined in Type - * Derivation OK (Simple) (�3.14.6) (if it is a simple type + * Derivation OK (Simple) ($3.14.6) (if it is a simple type * definition)." * * {disallowed substitutions}: the "block" on the element decl. @@ -25204,8 +25206,8 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) /* * SPEC (cvc-attribute) - * (1) "The declaration must not be �absent� (see Missing - * Sub-components (�5.3) for how this can fail to be + * (1) "The declaration must not be `absent` (see Missing + * Sub-components ($5.3) for how this can fail to be * the case)." * (2) "Its {type definition} must not be absent." * @@ -25255,15 +25257,15 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) * use with an {attribute declaration} whose {name} matches * the attribute information item's [local name] and whose * {target namespace} is identical to the attribute information - * item's [namespace name] (where an �absent� {target namespace} + * item's [namespace name] (where an `absent` {target namespace} * is taken to be identical to a [namespace name] with no value), - * then the attribute information must be �valid� with respect + * then the attribute information must be `valid` with respect * to that attribute use as per Attribute Locally Valid (Use) - * (�3.5.4). In this case the {attribute declaration} of that - * attribute use is the �context-determined declaration� for the + * ($3.5.4). In this case the {attribute declaration} of that + * attribute use is the `context-determined declaration` for the * attribute information item with respect to Schema-Validity - * Assessment (Attribute) (�3.2.4) and - * Assessment Outcome (Attribute) (�3.2.5). + * Assessment (Attribute) ($3.2.4) and + * Assessment Outcome (Attribute) ($3.2.5). */ iattr->state = XML_SCHEMAS_ATTR_ASSESSED; iattr->use = attrUse; @@ -25340,13 +25342,13 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) continue; /* * SPEC (cvc-complex-type) - * (3.2.2) "The attribute information item must be �valid� with - * respect to it as defined in Item Valid (Wildcard) (�3.10.4)." + * (3.2.2) "The attribute information item must be `valid` with + * respect to it as defined in Item Valid (Wildcard) ($3.10.4)." * * SPEC Item Valid (Wildcard) (cvc-wildcard) - * "... its [namespace name] must be �valid� with respect to + * "... its [namespace name] must be `valid` with respect to * the wildcard constraint, as defined in Wildcard allows - * Namespace Name (�3.10.4)." + * Namespace Name ($3.10.4)." */ if (xmlSchemaCheckCVCWildcardNamespace(type->attributeWildcard, iattr->nsName) == 0) { @@ -25382,11 +25384,11 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) * SPEC (cvc-complex-type) * (5) "Let [Definition:] the wild IDs be the set of * all attribute information item to which clause 3.2 - * applied and whose �validation� resulted in a - * �context-determined declaration� of mustFind or no - * �context-determined declaration� at all, and whose + * applied and whose `validation` resulted in a + * `context-determined declaration` of mustFind or no + * `context-determined declaration` at all, and whose * [local name] and [namespace name] resolve (as - * defined by QName resolution (Instance) (�3.15.4)) to + * defined by QName resolution (Instance) ($3.15.4)) to * an attribute declaration whose {type definition} is * or is derived from ID. Then all of the following * must be true:" @@ -25396,7 +25398,7 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) iattr->typeDef, XML_SCHEMAS_ID)) { /* * SPEC (5.1) "There must be no more than one - * item in �wild IDs�." + * item in `wild IDs`." */ if (wildIDs != 0) { /* VAL TODO */ @@ -25407,7 +25409,7 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) wildIDs++; /* * SPEC (cvc-complex-type) - * (5.2) "If �wild IDs� is non-empty, there must not + * (5.2) "If `wild IDs` is non-empty, there must not * be any attribute uses among the {attribute uses} * whose {attribute declaration}'s {type definition} * is or is derived from ID." @@ -25617,9 +25619,9 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) fixed = 0; /* * SPEC (cvc-attribute) - * (3) "The item's �normalized value� must be locally �valid� + * (3) "The item's `normalized value` must be locally `valid` * with respect to that {type definition} as per - * String Valid (�3.14.4)." + * String Valid ($3.14.4)." * * VAL TODO: Do we already have the * "normalized attribute value" here? @@ -25657,9 +25659,9 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) if (fixed) { /* * SPEC Attribute Locally Valid (Use) (cvc-au) - * "For an attribute information item to be�valid� + * "For an attribute information item to be `valid` * with respect to an attribute use its *normalized* - * value� must match the *canonical* lexical + * value must match the *canonical* lexical * representation of the attribute use's {value * constraint}value, if it is present and fixed." * @@ -25668,7 +25670,7 @@ xmlSchemaVAttributesComplex(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) */ /* * SPEC Attribute Locally Valid (cvc-attribute) - * (4) "The item's *actual* value� must match the *value* of + * (4) "The item's *actual* value must match the *value* of * the {value constraint}, if it is present and fixed." */ if (iattr->val == NULL) { @@ -25898,8 +25900,8 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSValidDefault(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt, * SPEC (2.1) "its {content type} must be a simple type definition * or mixed." * SPEC (2.2.2) "If the {content type} is mixed, then the {content - * type}'s particle must be �emptiable� as defined by - * Particle Emptiable (�3.9.6)." + * type}'s particle must be `emptiable` as defined by + * Particle Emptiable ($3.9.6)." */ if ((! WXS_HAS_SIMPLE_CONTENT(inode->typeDef)) && ((! WXS_HAS_MIXED_CONTENT(inode->typeDef)) || @@ -25915,14 +25917,14 @@ xmlSchemaCheckCOSValidDefault(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt, } /* * 1 If the type definition is a simple type definition, then the string - * must be �valid� with respect to that definition as defined by String - * Valid (�3.14.4). + * must be `valid` with respect to that definition as defined by String + * Valid ($3.14.4). * * AND * * 2.2.1 If the {content type} is a simple type definition, then the - * string must be �valid� with respect to that simple type definition - * as defined by String Valid (�3.14.4). + * string must be `valid` with respect to that simple type definition + * as defined by String Valid ($3.14.4). */ if (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(inode->typeDef)) { @@ -26163,10 +26165,10 @@ character_content: (! INODE_NILLED(inode))) { /* * cvc-elt (3.3.4) : 5.1.1 - * If the �actual type definition� is a �local type definition� + * If the `actual type definition` is a `local type definition` * then the canonical lexical representation of the {value constraint} - * value must be a valid default for the �actual type definition� as - * defined in Element Default Valid (Immediate) (�3.3.6). + * value must be a valid default for the `actual type definition` as + * defined in Element Default Valid (Immediate) ($3.3.6). */ /* * NOTE: 'local' above means types acquired by xsi:type. @@ -26196,9 +26198,9 @@ character_content: * cvc-elt (3.3.4) : 5.1.2 * The element information item with the canonical lexical * representation of the {value constraint} value used as its - * �normalized value� must be �valid� with respect to the - * �actual type definition� as defined by Element Locally Valid (Type) - * (�3.3.4). + * `normalized value` must be `valid` with respect to the + * `actual type definition` as defined by Element Locally Valid (Type) + * ($3.3.4). */ if (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(inode->typeDef)) { ret = xmlSchemaVCheckINodeDataType(vctxt, @@ -26245,18 +26247,18 @@ default_psvi: } else if (! INODE_NILLED(inode)) { /* - * 5.2.1 The element information item must be �valid� with respect - * to the �actual type definition� as defined by Element Locally - * Valid (Type) (�3.3.4). + * 5.2.1 The element information item must be `valid` with respect + * to the `actual type definition` as defined by Element Locally + * Valid (Type) ($3.3.4). */ if (WXS_IS_SIMPLE(inode->typeDef)) { /* * SPEC (cvc-type) (3.1) * "If the type definition is a simple type definition, ..." * (3.1.3) "If clause 3.2 of Element Locally Valid - * (Element) (�3.3.4) did not apply, then the �normalized value� - * must be �valid� with respect to the type definition as defined - * by String Valid (�3.14.4). + * (Element) ($3.3.4) did not apply, then the `normalized value` + * must be `valid` with respect to the type definition as defined + * by String Valid ($3.14.4). */ ret = xmlSchemaVCheckINodeDataType(vctxt, inode, inode->typeDef, inode->value); @@ -26264,14 +26266,14 @@ default_psvi: /* * SPEC (cvc-type) (3.2) "If the type definition is a complex type * definition, then the element information item must be - * �valid� with respect to the type definition as per - * Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) (�3.4.4);" + * `valid` with respect to the type definition as per + * Element Locally Valid (Complex Type) ($3.4.4);" * * SPEC (cvc-complex-type) (2.2) * "If the {content type} is a simple type definition, ... - * the �normalized value� of the element information item is - * �valid� with respect to that simple type definition as - * defined by String Valid (�3.14.4)." + * the `normalized value` of the element information item is + * `valid` with respect to that simple type definition as + * defined by String Valid ($3.14.4)." */ ret = xmlSchemaVCheckINodeDataType(vctxt, inode, inode->typeDef->contentTypeDef, inode->value); @@ -26313,8 +26315,8 @@ default_psvi: */ if (WXS_HAS_MIXED_CONTENT(inode->typeDef)) { /* - * 5.2.2.2.1 If the {content type} of the �actual type - * definition� is mixed, then the *initial value* of the + * 5.2.2.2.1 If the {content type} of the `actual type + * definition` is mixed, then the *initial value* of the * item must match the canonical lexical representation * of the {value constraint} value. * @@ -26338,8 +26340,8 @@ default_psvi: } } else if (WXS_HAS_SIMPLE_CONTENT(inode->typeDef)) { /* - * 5.2.2.2.2 If the {content type} of the �actual type - * definition� is a simple type definition, then the + * 5.2.2.2.2 If the {content type} of the `actual type + * definition` is a simple type definition, then the * *actual value* of the item must match the canonical * lexical representation of the {value constraint} value. */ @@ -26380,9 +26382,9 @@ end_elem: goto internal_error; /* * MAYBE TODO: - * SPEC (6) "The element information item must be �valid� with + * SPEC (6) "The element information item must be `valid` with * respect to each of the {identity-constraint definitions} as per - * Identity-constraint Satisfied (�3.11.4)." + * Identity-constraint Satisfied ($3.11.4)." */ /* * PSVI TODO: If we expose IDC node-tables via PSVI then the tables @@ -26460,8 +26462,8 @@ end_elem: vctxt->depth--; vctxt->inode = vctxt->elemInfos[vctxt->depth]; /* - * VAL TODO: 7 If the element information item is the �validation root�, it must be - * �valid� per Validation Root Valid (ID/IDREF) (�3.3.4). + * VAL TODO: 7 If the element information item is the `validation root`, it must be + * `valid` per Validation Root Valid (ID/IDREF) ($3.3.4). */ return (ret); @@ -26542,11 +26544,11 @@ xmlSchemaValidateChildElem(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) * Fallback to "anyType". * * SPEC (cvc-assess-elt) - * "If the item cannot be �strictly assessed�, [...] + * "If the item cannot be `strictly assessed`, [...] * an element information item's schema validity may be laxly - * assessed if its �context-determined declaration� is not - * skip by �validating� with respect to the �ur-type - * definition� as per Element Locally Valid (Type) (�3.3.4)." + * assessed if its `context-determined declaration` is not + * skip by `validating` with respect to the `ur-type + * definition` as per Element Locally Valid (Type) ($3.3.4)." */ vctxt->inode->typeDef = xmlSchemaGetBuiltInType(XML_SCHEMAS_ANYTYPE); @@ -26618,9 +26620,9 @@ xmlSchemaValidateChildElem(xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr vctxt) * SPEC (2.4) "If the {content type} is element-only or mixed, * then the sequence of the element information item's * element information item [children], if any, taken in - * order, is �valid� with respect to the {content type}'s + * order, is `valid` with respect to the {content type}'s * particle, as defined in Element Sequence Locally Valid - * (Particle) (�3.9.4)." + * (Particle) ($3.9.4)." */ ret = xmlRegExecPushString2(regexCtxt, vctxt->inode->localName, |