blob: 39f8f157d31deaa69527666cb7f44fc47256bb1a (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
$NetBSD: patch-sg,v 1.1 2007/11/29 02:49:12 rillig Exp $
For sunpro, "const char *" and "typedef'd const char *" are different
types that result in different mangled names. That's really hard to find
out:
Undefined symbol:
void UT_XML::processingInstruction(const char *, const char *);
Existing symbol:
void UT_XML::processingInstruction(const char *, const char *);
Spot the difference!
I couldn't find a tool that actually shows the differences between the
two mangled symbols. "dem --verbose __1c..." would be nice. No cookie
for Sun Microsystems.
--- src/af/util/xp/ut_xml.cpp.orig 2005-09-17 18:10:32.000000000 +0200
+++ src/af/util/xp/ut_xml.cpp 2007-11-28 17:19:04.574680000 +0100
@@ -174,9 +174,7 @@ void UT_XML::flush_all ()
}
}
-/* Declared in ut_xml.h as: void UT_XML::startElement (const XML_Char * name, const XML_Char ** atts);
- */
-void UT_XML::startElement (const char * name, const char ** atts)
+void UT_XML::startElement (const XML_Char * name, const XML_Char ** atts)
{
if (m_bStopped) return;
@@ -242,7 +240,7 @@ void UT_XML::charData (const char * buff
m_chardata_buffer[m_chardata_length] = 0;
}
-void UT_XML::processingInstruction (const char * target, const char * data)
+void UT_XML::processingInstruction (const XML_Char * target, const XML_Char * data)
{
if (m_bStopped) return;
if (m_pExpertListener)
|
