summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.Coding
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorvorlon <vorlon@alioth.debian.org>2007-11-21 17:44:34 +0000
committervorlon <vorlon@alioth.debian.org>2007-11-21 17:44:34 +0000
commit951fa9619c10959654b4f7d69c08722f1e76db71 (patch)
tree38907f3881253efb6119e4ac316f59548d9539e7 /README.Coding
parent6e61533d519c58d0a6360e20d42102b61dd0ddcb (diff)
downloadsamba-951fa9619c10959654b4f7d69c08722f1e76db71.tar.gz
merge upstream 3.0.27a into svn
git-svn-id: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-samba/trunk/samba@1586 fc4039ab-9d04-0410-8cac-899223bdd6b0
Diffstat (limited to 'README.Coding')
-rw-r--r--README.Coding215
1 files changed, 215 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/README.Coding b/README.Coding
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ba9e8be08c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/README.Coding
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+##
+## Coding conventions in the Samba 3.0 tree
+##
+
+===========
+Quick Start
+===========
+
+Coding style guidelines are about reducing the number of unnecessary
+reformatting patches and making things easier developers to work together.
+You don't have to like them or even agree with them, but once put in place
+we all have to abide by them (or vote to change them). However, coding
+style should never outweigh coding itself and so the the guidelines
+described here are hopefully easier enough to follow as they are very
+common and supported by tools and editors.
+
+The basic style, also mentioned in the SAMBA_4_0/prog_guide.txt is the
+Linux kernel coding style (See Documentation/CodingStyle in the kernel
+source tree). The closely matches what most Samba developers use already
+anyways.
+
+But to save you the trouble of reading the Linux kernel style guide, here
+are the highlights.
+
+
+* Maximum Line Width is 80 Characters
+ The reason is not for people with low-res screens but rather sticking
+ to 80 columns prevents you from easily nesting more than one level of
+ if statements or other code blocks. Use source/script/count_80_col.pl
+ to check your changes.
+
+* Use 8 Space Tabs to Indent
+ No whitespace filler.
+
+* No Trailing Whitespace
+ Use source/script/strip_trail_ws.pl to clean you files before committing.
+
+* Follow the K&R guidelines. We won't go throw them all here. You have
+ a copy of "The C Programming Language" anyways right? You can also use
+ the format_indent.sh script found in source/script/ if all else fails.
+
+
+
+============
+Editor Hints
+============
+
+Emacs
+-----
+Add the follow to your $HOME/.emacs file:
+
+ (add-hook 'c-mode-hook
+ (lambda ()
+ (c-set-style "linux")
+ (c-toggle-auto-state)))
+
+
+Vi
+--
+(Thanks to SATOH Fumiyasu <fumiyas@osstech.jp> for these hints):
+
+For the basic vi editor including with all variants of *nix, add the
+following to $HOME/.exrc:
+
+ set tabstop=8
+ set shiftwidth=8
+
+For Vim, the following settings in $HOME/.vimrc will also deal with
+displaying trailing whitespace:
+
+ if has("syntax") && (&t_Co > 2 || has("gui_running"))
+ syntax on
+ function! ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
+ syntax match TrailingSpace "[ \t]\+$" display containedin=ALL
+ highlight TrailingSpace ctermbg=Red
+ endf
+ autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead * call ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
+ endif
+
+
+=========================
+FAQ & Statement Reference
+=========================
+
+Comments
+--------
+
+Comments should always use the standard C syntax. I.e. /* ... */. C++
+style comments are not currently allowed.
+
+
+Indention & Whitespace & 80 columns
+-----------------------------------
+
+To avoid confusion, indentations are to be 8 character with tab (not
+8 ' ' characters. When wrapping parameters for function calls,
+alignment parameter list with the first parameter on the previous line.
+Use tabs to get as close as possible and then fill in the final 7
+characters or less with whitespace. For example,
+
+ var1 = foo(arg1, arg2,
+ arg3);
+
+The previous example is intended to illustrate alignment of function
+parameters across lines and not as encourage for gratuitous line
+splitting. Never split a line before columns 70 - 79 unless you
+have a really good reason. Be smart about formatting.
+
+
+If, switch, & Code blocks
+-------------------------
+
+Always follow an 'if' keyword with a space but don't include additional
+spaces following or preceding the parentheses in the conditional.
+This is good:
+
+ if (x == 1)
+
+This is bad:
+
+ if ( x == 1 )
+
+Yes we have a lot of code that uses the second form and we are trying
+to clean it up without being overly intrusive.
+
+Note that this is a rule about parentheses following keywords and not
+functions. Don't insert a space between the name and left parentheses when
+invoking functions.
+
+Braces for code blocks used by for, if, switch, while, do..while, etc...
+should begin on the same line as the statement keyword and end on a line
+of their own. NOTE: Functions are different and the beginning left brace
+should begin on a line of its own.
+
+If the beginning statement has to be broken across lines due to length,
+the beginning brace should be on a line of its own.
+
+The exception to the ending rule is when the closing brace is followed by
+another language keyword such as else or the closing while in a do..while
+loop.
+
+Good examples:
+
+ if (x == 1) {
+ printf("good\n");
+ }
+
+ for (x=1;
+ x<10;
+ x++)
+ {
+ print("%d\n", x);
+ }
+
+ do {
+ printf("also good\n");
+ } while (1);
+
+Bad examples:
+
+ while (1)
+ {
+ print("I'm in a loop!\n"); }
+
+
+Goto
+----
+
+While many people have been academically taught that goto's are fundamentally
+evil, then can greatly enhance readability and reduce memory leaks when used
+as the single exit point from a function. But in no Samba world what so ever
+is a goto outside of a function or block of code a good idea.
+
+Good Examples:
+
+int function foo(int y)
+{
+ int *z = NULL;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if ( y < 10 ) {
+ z = malloc(sizeof(int)*y);
+ if (!z) {
+ ret = 1;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
+
+ print("Allocated %d elements.\n", y);
+
+ done:
+ if (z)
+ free(z);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+Checking Pointer Values
+-----------------------
+
+When invoking functions that return pointer values, either of the following
+are acceptable. Use you best judgement and choose the more readable option.
+Remember that many other people will review it.
+
+ if ((x = malloc(sizeof(short)*10)) == NULL ) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
+ }
+
+or
+
+ x = malloc(sizeof(short)*10);
+ if (!x) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
+ }